Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34161332›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Association between COVID-19 outcomes and mask mandates, adherence, and attitudes.

Dhaval Adjodah, Karthik Dinakar, Matteo Chinazzi, Samuel P Fraiberger, Alex Pentland, Samantha Bates, Kyle Staller, Alessandro Vespignani, Deepak L Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Child mask mandates for COVID-19: a systematic review.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Effectiveness of Face Mask Mandates on COVID-19 Transmission in Utah.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dhaval AdjodahConnection Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Karthik DinakarMedia Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Matteo ChinazziLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-1929
Samuel P FraibergerConnection Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Alex PentlandMedia Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Samantha BatesCenter of Complex Interventions, Wellesley, MA, United States of America.
Kyle StallerDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Alessandro VespignaniLaboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Deepak L BhattHeart & Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-6245

Funding

The Role of Fiber in the Etiopathogenesis of Fecal IncontinenceK23DK120945 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STALLER, KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$1.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK120945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We extend previous studies on the impact of masks on COVID-19 outcomes by investigating an unprecedented breadth and depth of health outcomes, geographical resolutions, types of mask mandates, early versus later waves and controlling for other government interventions, mobility testing rate and weather. We show that mask mandates are associated with a statistically significant decrease in new cases (-3.55 per 100K), deaths (-0.13 per 100K), and the proportion of hospital admissions (-2.38 percentage points) up to 40 days after the introduction of mask mandates both at the state and county level. These effects are large, corresponding to 14% of the highest recorded number of cases, 13% of deaths, and 7% of admission proportion. We also find that mask mandates are linked to a 23.4 percentage point increase in mask adherence in four diverse states. Given the recent lifting of mandates, we estimate that the ending of mask mandates in these states is associated with a decrease of -3.19 percentage points in mask adherence and 12 per 100K (13% of the highest recorded number) of daily new cases with no significant effect on hospitalizations and deaths. Lastly, using a large novel survey dataset of 847 thousand responses in 69 countries, we introduce the novel results that community mask adherence and community attitudes towards masks are associated with a reduction in COVID-19 cases and deaths. Our results have policy implications for reinforcing the need to maintain and encourage mask-wearing by the public, especially in light of some states starting to remove their mask mandates.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMasksCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Health PolicyHumansSocial MediaUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34161332
PMCPMC8221503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.