Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34161281›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Proteasomal conformation controls unfolding ability.

Julianna R Cresti, Abramo J Manfredonia, Christopher E Bragança, Joseph A Boscia, Christina M Hurley, Mary D Cundiff, Daniel A Kraut

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phase separation of polyubiquitinated proteins in UBQLN2 condensates controls substrate fate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ubiquitin modulates 26Science advances · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julianna R CrestiDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.
Abramo J ManfredoniaDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-5485
Christopher E BragançaDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.
Joseph A BosciaDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-5879
Christina M HurleyDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.
Mary D CundiffDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-2131
Daniel A KrautDepartment of Chemistry, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085 daniel.kraut@villanova.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-5832
Villanova University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is the macromolecular machine responsible for the bulk of protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. As it degrades a ubiquitinated protein, the proteasome transitions from a substrate-accepting conformation (s1) to a set of substrate-processing conformations (s3 like), each stabilized by different intramolecular contacts. Tools to study these conformational changes remain limited, and although several interactions have been proposed to be important for stabilizing the proteasome's various conformations, it has been difficult to test these directly under equilibrium conditions. Here, we describe a conformationally sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer assay, in which fluorescent proteins are fused to Sem1 and Rpn6, which are nearer each other in substrate-processing conformations than in the substrate-accepting conformation. Using this assay, we find that two sets of interactions, one involving Rpn5 and another involving Rpn2, are both important for stabilizing substrate-processing conformations. Mutations that disrupt these interactions both destabilize substrate-processing conformations relative to the substrate-accepting conformation and diminish the proteasome's ability to successfully unfold and degrade hard-to-unfold substrates, providing a link between the proteasome's conformational state and its unfolding ability.

Indexed as

Protein UnfoldingFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGreen Fluorescent ProteinsModels, MolecularMutationProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein ConformationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA)ATP-dependent proteaseproteasomeprotein degradationprotein unfolding

Identifiers

PMID34161281
PMCPMC8237680
OpenAlexW3167717839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.