Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34161276›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Attention, awareness, and the right temporoparietal junction.

Andrew I Wilterson, Samuel A Nastase, Branden J Bio, Arvid Guterstam, Michael S A Graziano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Monitoring Attention in Self and Others.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Cortical networks involved in judging the attention of others.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A conceptual framework for consciousness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew I WiltersonDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-4080-5386
Samuel A NastasePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0001-7013-5275
Branden J BioDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Arvid GuterstamDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-1318
Michael S A GrazianoDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; graziano@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-3475
Princeton University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attention schema theory posits a specific relationship between subjective awareness and attention, in which awareness is the control model that the brain uses to aid in the endogenous control of attention. In previous experiments, we developed a behavioral paradigm in human subjects to manipulate awareness and attention. The paradigm involved a visual cue that could be used to guide attention to a target stimulus. In task 1, subjects were aware of the cue, but not aware that it provided information about the target. The cue measurably drew exogenous attention to itself. In addition, implicitly, the subjects' endogenous attention mechanism used the cue to help shift attention to the target. In task 2, subjects were no longer aware of the cue. The cue still measurably drew exogenous attention to itself, yet without awareness of the cue, the subjects' endogenous control mechanism was no longer able to use the cue to control attention. Thus, the control of attention depended on awareness. Here, we tested the two tasks while scanning brain activity in human volunteers. We predicted that the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) would be active in relation to the process in which awareness helps control attention. This prediction was confirmed. The right TPJ was active in relation to the effect of the cue on attention in task 1; it was not measurably active in task 2. The difference was significant. In our interpretation, the right TPJ is involved in an interaction in which awareness permits the control of attention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionAwarenessBehaviorBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetParietal LobeTask Performance and AnalysisTemporal LobeYoung AdultattentionawarenessfMRIpredictive modelingtemporoparietal junction

Identifiers

PMID34161276
PMCPMC8237657
OpenAlexW3168419716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.