Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34161252›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Acceptability and Feasibility of the Transfer of Face-to-Face Group Therapy to Online Group Chats in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Julia Scholl, Elisabeth Kohls, Frauke Görges, Marc Steinbrecher, Sabrina Baldofski, Markus Moessner, Christine Rummel-Kluge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. The effects of COVID-19 on European healthcare provision for working-age adults with major depressive disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia SchollDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-8870
Elisabeth KohlsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-6547
Frauke GörgesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-9686
Marc SteinbrecherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1399-5943
Sabrina BaldofskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-7914
Markus MoessnerCenter for Psychotherapy Research, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-1055
Christine Rummel-KlugeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, several mental health care providers were obliged to shut down outpatient services, including group therapy and psychoeducational sessions. The lockdown in many countries is a serious threat to people's mental well-being, especially for individuals with severe mental illnesses. Discontinued outpatient treatments and disruption of daily routines are considered to be risk factors for destabilization of patients with mental illness.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of a group chat program to replace cancelled face-to-face group sessions in an outpatient psychiatric department.

methodsParticipants (N=33) were recruited in the outpatient department of a large university medical center in Leipzig, Germany. Former face-to-face group participants were invited to take part in a therapist-guided group-chat for 4 weeks (8 sessions) and were asked to evaluate the program via self-administered standardized questionnaires at baseline (T0, preintervention), after every chat session (T1), and posttreatment (T2, after 4-6 weeks). The chat groups were specific to the following mental disorder diagnoses and based on the same therapeutic principles and techniques as the former face-to-face groups: anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Sociodemographic measures, attitudes toward the COVID-19 pandemic, depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), quality of life (abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment), treatment credibility/expectancy (Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire), and participants' satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [ZUF-8]) were measured.

resultsParticipants joined an average of 5 out of 8 offered chat sessions. Participation rates in the respective groups were highest in the ADHD group (8.6/11, 78%) and lowest in the anxiety group (3.7/9, 41%). The overall preintervention level of depressive symptoms was moderate and showed a slight, nonsignificant improvement at posttreatment (T0: mean 10.7, SD 5.5; T2: mean 10.2, SD 5.5). A similar result was observed regarding quality of life (T0: median 41.7-68.8; T2: median 50-70.3). Treatment credibility and expectancy scores were medium-high (T0: mean

conclusionsA therapist-guided group chat program to substitute outpatient group setting treatment during the COVID-19 lockdown was shown to be feasible, usable, and highly acceptable for participants. Web-based programs such as this one provide an easy-to-implement tool to successfully stabilize participants during a difficult time, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00021527; https://tinyurl.com/3btyxc2r.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 pandemice-mental healthgroup chatsmental healthonlineonline chatonline interventionspandemicpsychiatric outpatient settingpsychoeducation

Identifiers

PMID34161252
PMCPMC8315157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.