Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160846›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2021

Impact of isolation method on cellular activation and presence of specific tendon cell subpopulations during in vitro culture.

Anne E C Nichols, Samantha N Muscat, Sarah E Miller, Luke J Green, Michael S Richards, Alayna E Loiselle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Study on anti-adhesion effect and mechanism of dynamic and static stress stimulation during early healing process of rat Achilles tendon injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E C NicholsCenter for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8754-7735
Samantha N MuscatCenter for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sarah E MillerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Luke J GreenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Michael S RichardsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Alayna E LoiselleCenter for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Rochester Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Rochester Resource-Based Center for Bone, Muscle and Orthopaedic Research (ROCSTARR) (Overall Application)P30AR069655 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Edward M. Schwarz · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
s100a4 Signaling in Fibrotic Diabetic Tendon HealingR01AR073169 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOISELLE, ALAYNA · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Training in Musculoskeletal Science: Comprehensive Training in Pain StudiesT32AR076950 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Hani A Awad, Laura M Calvi · 2020 to 2026
$1.7M
Defining the relationship between attenuated insulin receptor signaling and fibrosis in diabetic tendinopathyK01AR068386 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOISELLE, ALAYNA · 2016 to 2019
$484k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR068386NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069655NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073169NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR076950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendon injuries are common and heal poorly, due in part to a lack of understanding of fundamental tendon cell biology. A major impediment to the study of tendon cells is the absence of robust, well-characterized in vitro models. Unlike other tissue systems, current tendon cell models do not account for how differences in isolation methodology may affect the activation state of tendon cells or the presence of various tendon cell subpopulations. The objective of this study was to characterize how common isolation methods affect the behavior, fate, and lineage composition of tendon cell cultures. Tendon cells isolated by explant exhibited reduced proliferative capacity, decreased expression of tendon marker genes, and increased expression of genes associated with fibroblast activation compared to digested cells. Consistently, explanted cells also displayed an increased propensity to differentiate to myofibroblasts compared to digested cells. Explanted cultures from multiple different tendons were substantially enriched for the presence of scleraxis-lineage (Scx-lin+) cells compared to digested cultures, while the overall percentage of S100a4-lineage (S100a4-lin+) cells was dependent on both isolation method and tendon of origin. Neither isolation methods preserved the ratios of Scx-lin+ or S100a4-lin+ to non-lineage cells seen in tendons in vivo. Combined, these data indicate that further refinement of in vitro cultures models is required in order to more accurately understand the effects of various stimuli on tendon cell behavior. Statement of clinical significance: The development of informed in vitro tendon cell models will facilitate enhanced screening of potential therapeutic candidates to improve tendon healing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyofibroblastsTendon InjuriesTendonsWound HealingBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBiomarkerscell culturefibroblast activationlineagetendon

Identifiers

PMID34160846
PMCPMC8232016
OpenAlexW3175474994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.