Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160744›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021

Routine screening for pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients at the emergency department: impact of D-dimer testing followed by CTPA.

Daniël A Korevaar, Ilayda Aydemir, Maartje W Minnema, Kaoutar Azijli, Ludo F Beenen, Jarom Heijmans, Nick van Es, Mohanad Al Masoudi, Lilian J Meijboom, Saskia Middeldorp and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniël A Korevaar *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.a.korevaar@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-7897
Ilayda Aydemir *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maartje W MinnemaSection Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kaoutar AzijliSection Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ludo F BeenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jarom HeijmansSection General and Acute Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nick van EsDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohanad Al MasoudiSection Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lilian J MeijboomDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia MiddeldorpDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Prabath W NanayakkaraSection General and Acute Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rick I MeijerDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter I Bonta *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Josien van Es *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 patients have increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), but symptoms of both conditions overlap. Because screening algorithms for PE in COVID-19 patients are currently lacking, PE might be underdiagnosed. We evaluated a screening algorithm in which all patients presenting to the ED with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 routinely undergo D-dimer testing, followed by CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) if D-dimer is ≥ 1.00 mg/L. Consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED of two university hospitals in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, between 01-10-2020 and 31-12-2020, who had a final diagnosis of COVID-19, were retrospectively included. D-dimer and CTPA results were obtained. Of 541 patients with a final diagnosis of COVID-19 presenting to the ED, 25 (4.6%) were excluded because D-dimer was missing, and 71 (13.1%) because they used anticoagulation therapy. Of 445 included patients, 185 (41.6%; 95%CI 37.0-46.3) had a D-dimer ≥ 1.00 mg/L. CTPA was performed in 169 of them, which showed PE in 26 (15.4%; 95%CI 10.3-21.7), resulting in an overall detection rate of 5.8% (95%CI 3.9-8.4) in the complete study group. In patients with and without PE at CTPA, median D-dimer was 9.84 (IQR 3.90-29.38) and 1.64 (IQR 1.17-3.01), respectively (p < 0.001). PE prevalence increased with increasing D-dimer, ranging from 1.2% (95%CI 0.0-6.4) if D-dimer was 1.00-1.99 mg/L, to 48.6% (95%CI 31.4-66.0) if D-dimer was ≥ 5.00 mg/L. In conclusion, by applying this screening algorithm, PE was identified in a considerable proportion of COVID-19 patients. Prospective management studies should assess if this algorithm safely rules-out PE if D-dimer is < 1.00 mg/L.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pulmonary EmbolismAdultAngiographyEmergency Service, HospitalFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DComputed tomography angiographyCOVID-19D-dimerPulmonary embolismSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID34160744
PMCPMC8221091
OpenAlexW3173255923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.