ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2021
Is white the right light for the clinical electrooculogram?
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of the clinical electrooculogram - Part 2: the bestrophinopathies and modified protocols.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Review of the clinical electrooculogram - Part 1: Mechanism of the Light-Rise.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- The short wavelength electro-oculogram (SW-EOG) in best disease: preliminary results.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Retinal electrophysiology in central nervous system disorders. A review of human and mouse studies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate if a lower luminance monochromatic LED stimulus could be used as an alternative to a high luminance white light for the clinical electrooculogram.
methodsClinical electrooculograms were recorded in color normal participants (N = 23) aged 22.6 ± 1.2 years, 7 male and 16 female using the standard 100 cd.m
resultsThe normalized LP:DTratio for the short wavelength LED (448 nm) was equivalent in amplitude and timing to the ISCEV standard EOG (p = .99). The LP:DTratio for the white (100 cd.m
conclusionsConsideration may be given to using a short wavelength monochromatic stimulus that is more comfortable for the subject than the current 100 cd.m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.