Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160683›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2021

Residual biomass from surfactin production is a source of arginase and adsorbed surfactin that is useful for environmental remediation.

Thais de Carvalho Silveira, Wyllerson Evaristo Gomes, Giovana Chinaglia Tonon, Thainá Godoy Beatto, Nicolas Spogis, Luiz Henrique Dallan Cunha, Bruno Pera Lattaro, Alessandra Borin Nogueira, Renata Kelly Mendes, Danillo Oliveira Alvarenga and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thais de Carvalho SilveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Wyllerson Evaristo GomesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sistemas de Infraestrutura Urbana, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Giovana Chinaglia TononFaculdade de Química, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini n° 1.516, Parque Rural Fazenda Santa Cândida, CEP 13087571, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Thainá Godoy BeattoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sistemas de Infraestrutura Urbana, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Nicolas SpogisFaculdade de Química, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini n° 1.516, Parque Rural Fazenda Santa Cândida, CEP 13087571, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Luiz Henrique Dallan CunhaFaculdade de Química, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini n° 1.516, Parque Rural Fazenda Santa Cândida, CEP 13087571, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Bruno Pera LattaroFaculdade de Química, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini n° 1.516, Parque Rural Fazenda Santa Cândida, CEP 13087571, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Alessandra Borin NogueiraFaculdade de Química, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas (PUC-Campinas), Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini n° 1.516, Parque Rural Fazenda Santa Cândida, CEP 13087571, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Renata Kelly MendesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Sistemas de Infraestrutura Urbana, Centro de Ciências Ambientais e de Tecnologias, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Danillo Oliveira AlvarengaDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Augusto EtchegarayPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Centro de Ciências da Vida, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil. augusto.etchegaray@puc-campinas.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0483-0373
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BRUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/0570-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/1330-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipopeptides are important secondary metabolites produced by microbes. They find applications in environmental decontamination and in the chemical, pharmaceutical and food industries. However, their production is expensive. In the present work we propose three strategies to lower the production costs of surfactin. First, the coproduction of surfactin and arginase in a single growth. Second, extract the fraction of surfactin that adsorbs to the biomass and is removed from the growth medium through centrifugation. Third, use microbial biomass for the remediation of organic and inorganic contaminants. The coproduction of surfactin and arginase was evaluated by factorial design experiments using the LB medium supplemented with arginine. The best conditions for surfactin production were 22 h of growth at 37 °C using LB supplemented with arginine 7.3 g/L. Almost similar conditions were found to produce highest levels of arginase, 24 h and 6.45 g/L arginine. Decontamination of phenol and copper from artificial samples was attained by treatment with residues from lipopeptide production. Thus, cell suspensions and wash-waters used to extract surfactin from the biomass. Cell suspensions were used to successfully remove hydroquinone. Cell suspensions and wash-waters containing surfactin were successfully used to recover copper from solution. Specific monitoring methods were used for phenol and metal solutions, respectively a biosensor based on tyrosinase and either atomic absorption flame ionization spectrometry or absorbance coupled to the Arduino™ platform. Therefore, we report three alternative strategies to lower the production costs in lipopeptide production, which include the effective recovery of copper and phenol from contaminated waters using residues from surfactin production. Sustainable and profitable production of surfactin can be achieved by a coproduction strategy of lipopeptides and enzymes. Lipopeptides are collected in the supernatant and enzymes in the biomass. In addition, lipopeptides that coprecipitate with biomass can be recovered by washing. Lipopeptide wash-waters find applications in remediation and cells can also be used for environmental decontamination.

Indexed as

ArginaseBacillusBacterial ProteinsBiomassBioreactorsCopperCulture MediaDNA, BacterialEnvironmental MicrobiologyEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHydroquinonesLipopeptidesPeptides, CyclicPhenolArginaseBacterial ProteinsCopperCulture MediaDNA, BacterialhydroquinoneHydroquinonesLipopeptidesPeptides, CyclicPhenolsurfactin peptideArginaseCopperEnvironmental decontaminationHydroquinoneLipopeptidesMicrobial biomassSurfactin

Identifiers

PMID34160683
OpenAlexW3173761307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.