Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160667›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Age-related post-error slowing and stimulus repetition effect in motor inhibition during a stop-signal task.

Howard Muchen Hsu, Shulan Hsieh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Howard Muchen HsuCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory, Control, Aging, Sleep, and Emotion (CASE), Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
Shulan HsiehCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory, Control, Aging, Sleep, and Emotion (CASE), Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan, 701, Taiwan. psyhsl@mail.ncku.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-244X

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 104-2410-H-006-021-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 106-2410-H-006-031-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2321-B-006-022-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 108-2410-H-006-038-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 110-2321-B-006-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how older adults react to a failed-inhibition error while performing a stop-signal task. That is, whether elderly people would exhibit enlarged post-error slowing and whether such slowing revealed an adaptive process, maladaptive process, or a mixture of maladaptive followed by adaptive processes. This study also addresses if the post-error process might further interact with a stimulus repetition effect based on the memory retrieval explanation. A group of 34 younger adults (age range 20-30 years) and a group of 34 older adults (age range 60-80 years) were included for the analyses. The results of the current study supported a mixture model by showing that older adults exhibited a larger post-error slowing than younger adults, and their post-error slowing was initially accompanied by deceased accuracy that then increased on the subsequent trial. Furthermore, such post-error slowing on older adults only occurred in the trial condition where the stimulus was repeated from the previous trial suggesting a memory-based process (a form of negative priming) involved in post-error processes. The implication of the current finding is that older adults might maintain the ability to detect and monitor the response error, yet their post-error adjustment might require a much longer time to start functioning well after the initial detrimental orienting response to the error and the entire process was memory-based.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAgedHumansReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.