Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160645›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2021

[Lymphoma in children and adolescents].

Ina Sorge, Thomas Walter Georgi, Franz Wolfgang Hirsch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [European radiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ina SorgeInstitut für Kinderradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Ina.sorge@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Thomas Walter GeorgiKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Franz Wolfgang HirschInstitut für Kinderradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueLymphoma is the third most common neoplasm in children. Detection, accurate staging, and restaging are important for all radiologists involved in the diagnosis of children. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), CT, ultrasound, X‑ray. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Whole-body imaging (MRI and PET-MRI or PET-CT) play a key role in diagnostics and for therapy selection in Hodgkin lymphoma. PERFORMANCE: In particular, hybrid imaging using ACHIEVEMENTS: Standardization of imaging and inclusion in therapy studies (e.g. within the framework of the EuroNet-PHL-C2 study) improves diagnostics and simultaneously reduces therapy-related side effects. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In Hodgkin lymphoma, deviations from the prescribed diagnostic procedure should be avoided. In clinically very heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), on the other hand, the diagnostic procedure should be adapted to the actual clinical condition of the child. The role of interim PET in NHL is currently still the subject of clinical discussion.

Indexed as

LymphomaPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdolescentChildFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsWhole Body ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsHodgkin lymphomaNeoplasm stagingNon-Hodgkin lymphomaPediatric cancerWhole body imaging

Identifiers

PMID34160645
OpenAlexW3176507023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.