Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160425›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Next-generation sequencing diagnostics of bacteremia in pediatric sepsis.

Thomas Schmoch, Jens H Westhoff, Sebastian O Decker, Annabell Skarabis, Georg F Hoffmann, Christian Dohna-Schwake, Ursula Felderhoff-Müser, Caroline Skolik, Manuel Feisst, Christina Klose and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An unusual case of severe pneumonia caused byWorld journal of emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Severe Intravascular Hemolysis fromInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas SchmochDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Jens H WesthoffDepartment of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
Sebastian O DeckerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital.
Annabell SkarabisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Georg F HoffmannDepartment of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg.
Christian Dohna-SchwakeDepartment of Pediatrics I, Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care, Pediatric Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Ursula Felderhoff-MüserDepartment of Pediatrics I, Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care, Pediatric Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Caroline SkolikInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg.
Manuel FeisstInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg.
Christina KloseInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg.
Thomas BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg.
Steffen LuntzCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS), Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital.
Kai SohnFraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEFraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

Dietmar Hopp Stiftung 1DH2111010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis and septic shock are the most severe forms of infection affecting predominantly elderly people, preterm and term neonates, and young infants. Even in high-income countries sepsis causes about 8% of admissions to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Early diagnosis, rapid anti-infective treatment, and prompt hemodynamic stabilization are crucial for patient survival. In this context, it is essential to identify the causative pathogen as soon as possible to optimize antimicrobial treatment. To date, culture-based diagnostic procedures (e.g., blood cultures) represent the standard of care. However, they have 2 major problems: on the one hand, in the case of very small sample volumes (and thus usually in children), they are not sufficiently sensitive. On the other hand, with a time-to-result of 2 to 5 days, blood cultures need a relatively long time for the anti-infective therapy to be calculated. To overcome these problems, culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures such as unbiased sequence analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma samples of septic patients by next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been tested successfully in adult septic patients. However, these results still need to be transferred to the pediatric setting.

methodsThe Next GeneSiPS-Trial is a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study used to assess the diagnostic performance of an NGS-based approach for the identification of causative pathogens in (preterm and term) neonates (d1-d28, n = 50), infants (d29 to <1 yr, n = 50), and toddlers (1 yr to <5 yr, n = 50) with suspected or proven severe sepsis or septic shock (according to the pediatric sepsis definition) by the use of the quantitative sepsis indicating quantifier (SIQ) score in comparison to standard of care (culture-based) microbiological diagnostics. Potential changes in anti-infective treatment regimens based on these NGS results will be estimated retrospectively by a panel of 3 independent clinical specialists. DISCUSSION: Neonates, infants, and young children are significantly affected by sepsis. Fast and more sensitive diagnostic approaches are urgently needed. This prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study seeks to evaluate an NGS-based approach in critically ill children suffering from sepsis.

trial registrationDRKS-ID: DRKS00015705 (registered October 24, 2018). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015705.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaBlood CultureChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMulticenter Studies as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID34160425
PMCPMC8238315
OpenAlexW3174798028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.