ArticleMedicine2021
Efficacy of Yukmijihwang-tang on symptoms of Alzheimer disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Immune-boosting effect ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- The Effects of Natural Product-Derived Extracts for Longitudinal Bone Growth: An Overview of In Vivo Experiments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, which may lead to severe memory loss and other cognitive disorders. Yukmijihwang-tang (YMJ), a type of Korean traditional herbal medicine, has been shown to be effective against neurodegenerative diseases. Although a meta-analysis on the efficacy of YMJ on AD exists, the study had some limitations, and there have been several newly published studies assessing the effect of YMJ. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of YMJ as a treatment for AD through a meta-analysis.
methodsA systematic search of the following electronic databases will be conducted to identify eligible studies: MEDLINE (PubMed), Elsevier (EMBASE), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Korean Medical Database (KMBASE), Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS), Korean Traditional Knowledge Portal, Citation Information by NII (CiNii), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). All randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of YMJ on the symptoms of AD will be included. Two independent reviewers will perform article retrieval, deduplication, data screening, data extraction, quality evaluation, and data analyses using RevMan version 5.4. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the quality of the trials.
resultsThis study will provide synthesis of the cognitive function measured with neuropsychological tests, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and activities of daily living (ADL) measured using validated scales. The clinical effective rate and adverse events will also be analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of YMJ for treating AD.
conclusionThis systematic review will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of YMJ in AD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because individual patient data will not be included in this study. The study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.