Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160196›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2021

Novel Treatment for Glioblastoma Delivered by a Radiation Responsive and Radiopaque Hydrogel.

Mathilde Bouché, Yuxi C Dong, Saad Sheikh, Kimberly Taing, Deeksha Saxena, Jessica C Hsu, Minna H Chen, Ryan D Salinas, Hongjun Song, Jason A Burdick and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nanomaterial-based contrast agents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Nanoparticle-assisted, image-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for cancer treatment.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathilde BouchéDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-1290
Yuxi C DongDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7739-3795
Saad SheikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard Atrium, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Kimberly TaingDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Deeksha SaxenaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard Atrium, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Jessica C HsuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Minna H ChenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Ryan D SalinasDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Hongjun SongDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-332X
Jay DorseyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard Atrium, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
David P CormodeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-9500
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
Local circuitry mechanisms regulating adult hippocampal neurogenesisR37NS047344 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SONG, HONGJUN · 2013 to 2019
$2.9M
Nanoparticle contrast agents for earlier breast cancer detectionR01CA227142 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORMODE, DAVID PETER · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Biodegradable polymetal nanoparticle CT contrast agents for vascular imagingR01HL131557 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CORMODE, DAVID PETER · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227142NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131557NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS047344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) is hampered by primary tumor recurrence after surgical resection and poor prognosis, despite adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In search of improved outcomes for this disease, quisinostat appeared as a lead compound in drug screening. A delivery system was devised for this drug and to exploit current clinical methodology: an injectable hydrogel, loaded with both the quisinostat drug and radiopaque gold nanoparticles (AuNP) as contrast agent, that can release these payloads as a response to radiation. This hydrogel grants high local drug concentrations, overcoming issues with current standards of care. Significant hydrogel degradation and quisinostat release were observed due to the radiation trigger, providing high in vitro anticancer activity. In vivo, the combination of radiotherapy and the radiation-induced delivery of quisinostat from the hydrogel, successfully inhibited tumor growth in a mice model bearing xenografted human GBM tumors with a total response rate of 67%. Long-term tolerability was observed after intratumoral injection of the quisinostat loaded hydrogel. The AuNP payload enabled precise image-guided radiation delivery and the monitoring of hydrogel degradation using computed tomography (CT). These exciting results highlight this hydrogel as a versatile imageable drug delivery platform that can be activated simultaneously to radiation therapy and potentially offers improved treatment for GBM.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaMetal NanoparticlesGoldHumansHydrogelsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalGoldHydrogelscomputed tomographydrug deliveryglioblastomahydrogelsstimuli-responsive materials

Identifiers

PMID34160196
PMCPMC8411482
OpenAlexW3175088127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.