Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160114›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2022

Integrative Machine Learning Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Results From Negative Multiparametric MRI.

Haoxin Zheng, Qi Miao, Yongkai Liu, Steven S Raman, Fabien Scalzo, Kyunghyun Sung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haoxin ZhengDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8081-1940
Qi MiaoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-8997
Yongkai LiuDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Steven S RamanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.
Fabien ScalzoSeaver College, Pepperdine University, Malibu, California, 90263, USA.
Kyunghyun SungDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-5322

Funding

Integrating Quantitative MRI and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Prostate Cancer ClassificationR01CA248506 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUNG, KYUNG HYUN, WU, HOLDEN H · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is commonly recommended as a triage test prior to any prostate biopsy. However, there exists limited consensus on which patients with a negative prostate mpMRI could avoid prostate biopsy. PURPOSE: To identify which patient could safely avoid prostate biopsy when the prostate mpMRI is negative, via a radiomics-based machine learning approach. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Three hundred thirty patients with negative prostate 3T mpMRI between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0 T/T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) imaging (T ASSESSMENT: The integrative machine learning (iML) model was trained to predict negative prostate biopsy results, utilizing both radiomics and clinical features. The final study cohort comprised 330 consecutive patients with negative mpMRI (PI-RADS < 3) who underwent systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) or MR-ultrasound fusion (MRUS) biopsy within 6 months. A secondary analysis of biopsy naïve subcohort (n = 227) was also conducted. STATISTICAL TESTS: The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-Squared test were utilized to evaluate the significance of difference of clinical features between prostate biopsy positive and negative groups. The model performance was validated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and measured by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV).

resultsOverall, 306/330 (NPV 92.7%) of the final study cohort patients had negative biopsies, and 207/227 (NPV 91.2%) of the biopsy naïve subcohort patients had negative biopsies. Our iML model achieved NPVs of 98.3% and 98.0% for the study cohort and subcohort, respectively, superior to prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD)-based risk assessment with NPVs of 94.9% and 93.9%, respectively. DATA

conclusionThe proposed iML model achieved high performance in predicting negative prostate biopsy results for patients with negative mpMRI. With improved NPVs, the proposed model can be used to stratify patients who in whom we might obviate biopsies, thus reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateRetrospective Studiesmachine learningmultiparametric MRIprostate cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34160114
PMCPMC8678175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.