Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160085›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2021

Process and procedural adjustments to improve CD34+ collection efficiency of hematopoietic progenitor cell collections in sickle cell disease.

Scott T Avecilla, Farid Boulad, Karina Yazdanbakhsh, Michel Sadelain, Patricia A Shi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02193191 (Safety and Efficacy Trial of Escalation of Plerixafor for Mobilization of CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Evaluation of Globin Gene Transfer in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02193191 phase1completednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy Trial of Escalation of Plerixafor for Mobilization of CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Evaluation of Globin Gene Transfer in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2014 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsSickle Cell DiseaseArmsPlerixafor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott T AvecillaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-9704
Farid BouladDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Karina YazdanbakhshLindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michel SadelainCenter for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Patricia A ShiLindsley F. Kimball Research Institute (NYBC), Sickle Cell Program, Division of Hematology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-0055

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Sickle cell bone marrow niche and regulation of platelet activation and erythropoiesisP01HL149626 · NHLBI · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI Karina Yazdanbakhsh · 2020 to 2026
$24.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL149626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate CD34+ collection efficiency (CE) is critical to achieve target CD34+ cell doses in hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collections. Autologous HPC collection in sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with unstable collection interfaces and low CD34+ CEs. We hypothesized that variables specific to SCD, activation of blood cells and elevated viscosity, might contribute to these issues and made adjustments to the collection process and procedure to address our hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsIn two patients with SCD undergoing autologous HPC collection on our clinical trial (NCT02193191), we therefore implemented adjustments to the process and procedure in the following areas: proximity of RBC exchange to HPC collection, the type of anticoagulation, and the packing factor setting.

resultsThere was no collection interface instability. Our CD34+ CE1s were high at 70% and 51%, and granulocyte CE, platelet CE, and product granulocyte % were remarkably low. Product hematocrits were not as high as previously reported to be required to obtain adequate CEs. Interestingly, one HPC product showed a hemoglobin S (HbS) of 91% at the same time that the peripheral blood (PB) showed a HbS of 22%. DISCUSSION: Adjustments to the HPC collection process and procedure were associated with adequate CD34+ CEs and low granulocyte and platelet contamination in HPC products from SCD patients. Given the discrepancy in the percentage of sickle RBCs in the product versus the PB, we hypothesize that CD34+ cells and RBCs may aggregate. Our interventions and hypothesis should be further investigated in larger studies.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAntigens, CD34Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHematopoietic Stem CellsBenzylaminesClinical Trials as TopicCyclamsHematocritHumansAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesCyclamsplerixaforcellular therapyhematology-red cellstransplantation-stem cell

Identifiers

PMID34160085
PMCPMC9164294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.