Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34160006›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2021

Studying Müllerian duct anomalies - from cataloguing phenotypes to discovering causation.

Laura Santana González, Mara Artibani, Ahmed Ashour Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment of septate uterus.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Development and characterization of human fetal female reproductive tract organoids to understand Müllerian duct anomalies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Santana GonzálezMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5355-3539
Mara ArtibaniMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Ahmed Ashour AhmedMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-2581
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are developmental disorders of the Müllerian duct, the embryonic anlage of most of the female reproductive tract. The prevalence of MDAs is 6.7% in the general female population and 16.7% in women who exhibit recurrent miscarriages. Individuals affected by these anomalies suffer from high rates of infertility, first-trimester pregnancy losses, premature labour, placental retention, foetal growth retardation and foetal malpresentations. The aetiology of MDAs is complex and heterogeneous, displaying a range of clinical pictures that generally lack a direct genotype-phenotype correlation. De novo and familial cases sharing the same genomic lesions have been reported. The familial cases follow an autosomal-dominant inheritance, with reduced penetrance and variable expressivity. Furthermore, few genetic factors and molecular pathways underpinning Müllerian development and dysregulations causing MDAs have been identified. The current knowledge in this field predominantly derives from loss-of-function experiments in mouse and chicken models, as well as from human genetic association studies using traditional approaches, such as microarrays and Sanger sequencing, limiting the discovery of causal factors to few genetic entities from the coding genome. In this Review, we summarise the current state of the field, discuss limitations in the number of studies and patient samples that have stalled progress, and review how the development of new technologies provides a unique opportunity to overcome these limitations. Furthermore, we discuss how these new technologies can improve functional validation of potential causative alterations in MDAs.

Indexed as

PhenotypeFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansMullerian DuctsPregnancyDevelopmental model systemsHeterogeneous disordersMüllerian developmentMüllerian duct anomaliesState-of-the-art technologies

Identifiers

PMID34160006
PMCPMC8246269
OpenAlexW3175212277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.