Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159837›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated With Decreased Rates of Hardware-Related Revision After Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

Patawut Bovonratwet, Alex Gu, Aaron Z Chen, Andre M Samuel, Avani S Vaishnav, Evan D Sheha, Catherine H Gang, Sheeraz A Qureshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Impact of surgeon's dominant hand-side consistency with surgical approach on operational efficiency of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a prospective cohort study].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Is virtual reality training for lumbosacral freehand pedicle screw placement an alternative to conventional training?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fostering International Knowledge Sharing and Clinical Excellence: A Partnership and Inaugural Academic Conference.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patawut BovonratwetDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Alex GuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Aaron Z ChenWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Andre M SamuelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Avani S VaishnavDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1847-6915
Evan D ShehaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Catherine H GangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Sheeraz A QureshiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7177-1756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectiveTo (1) define utilization trends for navigated instrumented posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), (2) compare reasons and rates of revision at 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year follow-up, and (3) compare 90-day perioperative complications between navigated versus conventional instrumented PLF.

methodsPatients who underwent navigated or conventional instrumented PLF were identified from the Humana insurance database using the PearlDiver Patient Records between 2007-2017. Usage of navigation was characterized. Patient demographics and operative characteristics (number of levels fused, interbody usage) were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Propensity score matching was done and comparisons were made for revision rates at different follow-up periods (categorized by reasons) and other 90-day perioperative complications.

resultsThis study included 1,648 navigated and 23 429 conventional instrumented PLF. Navigated cases increased over the years studied to approximately 10% in 2017. Statistical analysis after propensity score matching revealed significantly lower rates of hardware-related revision at 90-day follow-up in the navigated cohort (0.49% versus 1.15%,

conclusionsThese findings suggest that navigation is associated with reductions in hardware-related revisions after instrumented PLF. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously in the setting of potential confounding by other unmeasured variables.

Indexed as

computer assisted navigationfixationfusionlumbarlumbar interbody fusionpediclepedicle screwspinal navigation

Identifiers

PMID34159837
PMCPMC10189316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.