Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159820›Full record

SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

Woven EndoBridge device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of clinical and angiographic results.

Yong Xie, Huan Tian, Bin Xiang, Jian Liu, Hua Xiang

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Woven EndoBridge versus stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms: A multicentric experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Heterogeneous model to evaluate CFD in intracranial bifurcation aneurysms treated with the WEB device to predict angiographic outcome.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yong XieDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-7854
Huan TianDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-2170
Bin XiangDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Hua XiangDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Hunan Normal University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe clinical outcome and angiographic outcome data of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are limited. We conducted a meta-analysis of the latest literature on the WEB device in the treatment of ruptured IAs.

methodsA comprehensive literature search of 4 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase) was conducted for studies published from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted variables (aneurysm and patient characteristics) using a prespecified data-collection sheet. Outcomes studied included initial and latest follow-up angiographic outcomes, technical success rate, perioperative mortality, retreated rate, perioperative re-bleeding, complication, intraoperative rupture, favorable neurologic outcome at discharge. We used random-effects model to pool the data.

resultsWe finally presented the results of 7 articles including 276 patients with 283 aneurysms. Initial complete and adequate occlusion rate were 38% (95% CI, 25%-50%) and 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%), respectively. Latest follow-up complete and adequate occlusion rate were 61% (95% CI, 46%-75%) and 91% (95% CI, 84%-98%), respectively.Technical success rate was 99% (95% CI, 98%-100%). Perioperative mortality rates and perioperative re-bleeding rate were 9% (95% CI, 3%-15%) and 1% (95% CI, 0%-2%), respectively. Retreated rate was 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%). Overall and WEB treatment-related thromboembolic complication was 10% (95% CI, 6%-13%) and 7% (95% CI, 2%-12%), respectively. Intraoperative rupture rate was 3% (95% CI, 0%-6%).

conclusionEndovascular treatment of ruptured IAs with the WEB device has a good safety profile and an acceptable aneurysm occlusion rate.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeendovascular treatmentIntracranial aneurysmWoven EndoBridge

Identifiers

PMID34159820
PMCPMC9131500
OpenAlexW3174803976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.