Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159641›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2021

Safety and feasibility of hemodynamic pulmonary artery pressure monitoring using the CardioMEMS device in LVAD management.

Jesse F Veenis, Sumant P Radhoe, Nicolas M van Mieghem, Olivier C Manintveld, Jos A Bekkers, Kadir Caliskan, Ad J J C Bogers, Felix Zijlstra, Jasper J Brugts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hemodynamic Monitoring of Pediatric Patients With Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension Using CardioMEMS.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesse F VeenisDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-8266
Sumant P RadhoeDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-6715
Nicolas M van MieghemDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-1205
Olivier C ManintveldDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-7314
Jos A BekkersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-9239
Kadir CaliskanDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-9261
Ad J J C BogersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-1998
Felix ZijlstraDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper J BrugtsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-9318
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a clinical need for additional remote tools to improve left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patient management. The aim of this pilot concept study was to assess the safety and feasibility of optimizing patient management with add-on remote hemodynamic monitoring using the CardioMEMS in LVAD patients during different treatment stages.

methodsTen consecutive patients accepted and clinically ready for (semi-) elective HeartMate 3 LVAD surgery were included. All patients received a CardioMEMS to optimize filling pressure before surgery. Patients were categorized into those with normal mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (≤25 mmHg, n = 4) or elevated mPAP (>25 mmHg, n = 6), and compared to a historical cohort (n = 20). Endpoints were CardioMEMS device safety and a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy and/or right ventricular failure at 1-year follow-up. Additionally, we investigated hospital-free survival and improvement in quality of life (QoL) and exercise tolerance.

resultsNo safety issues or signal interferences were observed. The combined endpoint occurred in 60% of historical controls, 0% in normal and 83% in elevated mPAP group. Post-discharge, the hospital-free survival was significantly better, and the QoL improved more in the normal compared to the elevated mPAP group.

conclusionRemote hemodynamic monitoring in LVAD patients is safe and feasible with the CardioMEMS, which could be used to identify patients at elevated risk of complications as well as optimize patient management remotely during the out-patient phase with less frequent hospitalizations. Larger pivotal studies are warranted to test the hypothesis generated from this concept study.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHemodynamic MonitoringAftercareFeasibility StudiesHemodynamicsHumansPatient DischargePulmonary ArteryQuality of LifeCardioMEMSheart failureHeartMate 3LVADremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34159641
PMCPMC8453715
OpenAlexW3174746926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.