Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159564›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2021

Computational Lock and Key and Dynamic Trajectory Analysis of Natural Biophors Against COVID-19 Spike Protein to Identify Effective Lead Molecules.

Irfan Navabshan, Balasubramaniyan Sakthivel, Rajesh Pandiyan, Mariya Gover Antoniraj, Selvakumar Dharmaraj, Veeramuthu Ashokkumar, Kuan Shiong Khoo, Kit Wayne Chew, Abimanyu Sugumaran, Pau Loke Show

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Antimicrobial Potential of the Neem TreeFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Irfan NavabshanCrescent School of Pharmacy, B.S. Abdur Rahman Cresent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Balasubramaniyan SakthivelDrug Discovery and Development Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, University College of Engineering, Anna University, BIT Campus, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, 620024, India.
Rajesh PandiyanCentre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, 600073, India.
Mariya Gover AntonirajDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Selvakumar DharmarajDepartment of Marine Biotechnology, Academy of Maritime Education and Training [AMET] (Deemed To Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603112, India.
Veeramuthu AshokkumarFaculty of Science, Center of Excellence in Catalysis for Bioenergy and Renewable Chemicals (CBRC), Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kuan Shiong KhooDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Kit Wayne ChewSchool of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University Malaysia, Jalan Sunsuria, Bandar Sunsuria, 43900, Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Abimanyu SugumaranDepartment of Pharmaceutics, SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, 603203, India. abipharmastar@gmail.com.
Pau Loke ShowDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. PauLoke.Show@nottingham.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-5409
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus · MYAlagappa University · INAMET University · INAnna University, Chennai · INBharath University · INB.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology · INChulalongkorn University · THSRM Institute of Science and Technology · INXiamen University Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New pandemic infection of coronaviridae family virus spread to more than 210 countries with total infection of 1,136,851 and 62,955 (4.6%) deaths until 5th April 2020. Which stopped the regular cycle of humankind but the nature is consistently running. There is no micro molecule remedy found yet to restore the regular life of people. Hence, we decided to work on natural biophores against the COVID proteins. As a first step, major phytoconstituents of antiviral herbs like Leucas aspera, Morinda citrifolia, Azadirachta indica, Curcuma longa, Piper nigrum, Ocimum tenuiflorum, and Corallium rubrum collected and performed the lock and key analysis with major spike protein of COVID-19 to find the best fitting lead biophore using computational drug design platform. The results of protocol run showed, phytoconstituents of Morinda citrifolia and Leucas aspera were found lower binding energy range of - 55.18 to - 25.34 kcal/mol, respectively and compared with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (- 24.29 kcal/mol) and Remdesivir (- 25.38 kcal/mol). The results conclude that, core skeletons chromen, anthracene 9, 11 dione and long-chain alkyl acids/ester-containing biophores showen high stable antagonistic affinity with S-protein. Which leads the breakdown of spike protein and ACE2 receptor complex formation and host mechanism of corono virus. In addition, the dynamic trajectory analysis confirmed the complete denaturation of spike protein by the molecule 4-(24-hydroxy-1-oxo-5-n-propyltetracosanyl)-phenol from Leucas aspera and stability of spike-ligand complex. These biophores will aid the researcher to fabricate new promising analogue and being recommended to assess its COVID-19 treatment.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCatalytic DomainCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug DesignHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular StructurePhytochemicalsPlants, MedicinalProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntiviral AgentsPhytochemicalsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Anthracene 9,11 dioneCOVID-19Dynamic simulationIn-silico methodNatural BiophorsSpike Protein

Identifiers

PMID34159564
PMCPMC8219180
OpenAlexW3173770226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.