Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159467›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2021

Longitudinal study on prenatal depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hernán López-Morales, Macarena Verónica Del-Valle, María Laura Andrés, Rosario Gelpi Trudo, Lorena Canet-Juric, Sebastián Urquijo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hernán López-MoralesInstituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina. hernanlopezmorales@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-1584
Macarena Verónica Del-ValleInstituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
María Laura AndrésInstituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Rosario Gelpi TrudoInstituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Lorena Canet-Juric *Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Sebastián Urquijo *Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada y Tecnología (IPSIBAT), Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva IF-2020-37418385-APN-SSFCTEI#MCT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have reported the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic context on mental health. Given that pregnant women constitute a vulnerable group, they may be at greater risk for developing psychopathological symptoms due to the confinement. The current study aimed to longitudinally analyze the presence and evolution of indicators of depression and anxiety in pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to identify the differential effects of social isolation or distancing measures on these groups. Participants were 105 pregnant and 105 non-pregnant Argentine adult women. They completed the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and closed-ended questions on sociodemographic factors, at four different times. Results showed a progressive increase in anxiety and depressive symptoms in the first 50 days of confinement in both groups, and a slight decrease after approximately 150 days. Pregnant women presented a more pronounced initial increase in symptoms, and a weaker decrease at the last wave, compared to the non-pregnant. Results suggest that the pandemic context produces a moderate negative early response and that the initial flexibilizations of sanitary measures (50 days) did not slow down the progression of symptoms (even less in pregnant women). In conclusion, being pregnant could be an extra risk factor for the development of psychopathological symptoms during this pandemic. The particular vulnerability of pregnant women and the associated potential negative effects both on them and on their offspring underline the importance of perinatal health policies aimed at prevention and treatment of possible future consequences.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalLockdownPregnancyPrenatal anxietyPrenatal depressionStress

Identifiers

PMID34159467
PMCPMC8219177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.