Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159463›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

A novel Veress needle mechanism that reduces overshooting after puncturing the abdominal wall.

Roelf R Postema, David Cefai, Bart van Straten, Rein Miedema, Latifa Lesmana Hardjo, Jenny Dankelman, Felix Nickel, Tim Horeman-Franse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roelf R PostemaDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-0904
David CefaiEngineering Department, ProVinci Medtech, 2631 CM, Nootdorp, The Netherlands.
Bart van StratenDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Rein MiedemaDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Latifa Lesmana HardjoDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jenny DankelmanDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Felix NickelDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tim Horeman-FranseDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands. t.horeman@tudelft.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplications that occur in laparoscopic surgery are often associated with the initial entry into the peritoneal cavity. The literature reported incidences of Veress needle (VN) injuries of e.g. 0.31% and 0.23%. In a 2010 national survey of laparoscopic entry techniques in the Canadian General Surgical practice, 57.3% of respondents had either experienced or witnessed a serious laparoscopic entry complication like bowel perforation and vascular injury. As those complications are potentially life threatening and should be avoided at all costs, improving safety of this initial action is paramount.

methodsBased on a bare minimum design approach with focus on function expansion of existing components, a new Safety mechanism was developed for the VN that decreases the risks of VN overshooting. The mechanism works by preventing the puncturing acceleration of the tip of the VN by decoupling the surgeon's hand from the VN immediately after entering the abdomen.

resultsBased on a set of requirements, a first prototype of the VN+ with force decoupling safety mechanism is presented and evaluated on an ex vivo porcine abdominal wall tissue model in a custom setup. The experiments conducted by two novices and one experienced surgeon indicated a significant difference between the attempts with a standard, conventional working VN (41.4 mm [37.5-45 mm]) and VN+ with decoupling mechanism (20.8 mm [17.5-22.5 mm]) of p < 0.001.

conclusionA new decoupling safety mechanism was integrated successfully in a standard VN resulting in a VN+ . The results from the pilot study indicate that this new VN+ reduces overshooting with a minimum of 50% in a standardised ex vivo setting on fresh porcine abdominal wall specimens.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallLaparoscopyAnimalsCanadaNeedlesPilot ProjectsSwineEntry techniqueLaparoscopySafety MechanismVeress needle

Identifiers

PMID34159463
PMCPMC8437840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.