Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159450›Full record

SynthesisWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Hearing impairment and diverse health outcomes : An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies.

Mike Trott, Lee Smith, Tao Xiao, Nicola Veronese, Ai Koyanagi, Louis Jacob, Guillermo F Lopez-Sanchez, Yvonne Barnett, Shahina Pardhan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age-Related Hearing Loss: Evidence-Based Strategies for Early Detection and Management.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Mike TrottVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Young Street, CB1 2LZ, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-3407
Lee SmithThe Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, CB1 1PT, Cambridge, UK. lee.smith@aru.ac.uk.
Tao XiaoCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Nicola VeroneseGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ai KoyanagiICREA, Pg. Lluis Companys 23, Barcelona, Spain.
Louis JacobResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillermo F Lopez-SanchezVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Young Street, CB1 2LZ, Cambridge, UK.
Yvonne BarnettAnglia Ruskin University, CB1 1PT, Cambridge, UK.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Young Street, CB1 2LZ, Cambridge, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESShenzhen University · CNUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, it is estimated that approximately 1.3 billion people live with some form of hearing impairment. Major causes of hearing loss include infection/disease, age-related factors, and occupational factors. Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have attempted to synthesise literature on these topics. To date there has not been a systematic evaluation of the relationships between hearing impairment and diverse physical, mental, and social outcomes.

objectiveWe performed an umbrella review of systematic reviews of observational studies with meta-analyses for any physical disease, biomarkers of disease, mental health or cognitive outcomes, and/or modifiable risk factors associated with hearing impairment.

methodsFor each meta-analytic association, random effects summary effect size, 95% confidence intervals, heterogeneity, evidence for small-study effect, excess significance bias and 95% prediction intervals were calculated, and risk of bias was assessed via the AMSTAR2 tool. These were used to grade significant evidence (p < 0.05) from I to IV, using the recommendations from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

resultsFrom 3747 studies, 21 were included covering 54 outcomes. Overall, 44/54 outcomes (82%) yielded significant results. Of the highest quality evidence, age-related hearing loss and non-specific hearing impairment were negatively associated with several types of cognitive impairments; pediatric bilateral hearing loss was negatively associated with quality of life, sensorineural hearing loss was positively associated with rheumatoid arthritis and tinnitus was positively associated with temporomandibular disorders. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Results show moderate quality evidence for associations between several types of hearing impairments and cognitive difficulties, quality of life and systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Practitioners and public health policies should note these findings when developing relevant healthcare policies.

Indexed as

Hearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralChildHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as TopicDeafDeafnessHearing impairmentHearing lossUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID34159450
OpenAlexW3177233044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.