ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022
Psychooncological distress in low-grade glioma patients-a monocentric study.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Dual Impact of Glioma Resection on Survival and Health-Related Quality of Life: Resect More, Live Better.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to self-management in people living with a lower-grade glioma.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Distinguishing Mental From Physical Fatigue in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of hybrid remote neuropsychological rehabilitation on cognitive complaints in post-therapeutic lower-grade glioma: the FREEDOME randomized study protocol.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Clusters of resilience and vulnerability: executive functioning, coping and mental distress in patients with diffuse low-grade glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- "It changes everything": Understanding how people experience the impact of living with a lower-grade glioma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- Benchmarking palliative care practices in neurooncology: a german perspective.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Palliative care for in-patient malignant glioma patients in Germany.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Influence of neuropathological diagnosis on psychooncological distress in neurooncological patients - a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Psycho-oncological burden in patients with brain metastases undergoing neurological surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Frequency of social burden and underage children in neuro-oncological patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Brain Tumor at Diagnosis: From Cognition and Behavior to Quality of Life.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Pre-treatment Emotional Distress in Patients Irradiated for Malignant Glioma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients diagnosed with low-grade glioma (LGG) must live with constant knowledge of an upcoming malignant tumor transformation which may lead to increased anxiety and reduced quality of life. Here, we (1) analyzed the prevalence and risk factors for distress in LGG patients using (2) different screening tools to subsequently (3) evaluate their need for psychological support.
methodPatients with LGG-suspicious findings in MRI studies as well as patients with histopathological confirmed LGG were screened using three established self-assessment instruments (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Distress Thermometer, EORTC-QLQ-C30-BN20). Screening results were correlated with sociodemographic factors.
resultsOne hundred forty-nine patients (74 men and 75 women) were prospectively included. Patients were further divided into different subgroups regarding the time of screening and diagnosis. An increased level of distress was observed in 20.8% (mean score 1.21, 95% CI 1.15-1.28) of all patients screened by HADS. Significant associated factors were pre-existing psychiatric disorders (p = 0.003) and psychotropic medication (p = 0.029). HRQoL (p = 0.022) and global health item (p = 0.015), as well as future uncertainty (p = 0.047), assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30-BN20 were significantly higher in those patients without histopathological diagnosis. Increased distress was significantly correlated with results in chosen sub-items of the HRQoL questionnaire (p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the need for frequent distress screening. If specific tools are not available, HRQoL questionnaires can also be used. Patients with pre-existing psychological stress should be offered additional psychooncological support, irrespectively of the time of screening or tumor diagnosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 4087.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.