Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159412›Full record

Trial reportDer Anaesthesist2021

Combined spinal epidural anesthesia in obese parturients undergoing cesarean surgery : A single-blinded randomized comparison of lateral decubitus and sitting positions.

Fatma Okucu, Mehmet Aksoy, Ilker Ince, Ayse Nur Aksoy, Aysenur Dostbıl, Ozgur Ozmen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma OkucuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Mehmet AksoyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey. drmaksoy@hotmail.com.
Ilker InceDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ayse Nur AksoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Erzurum, Turkey.
Aysenur DostbılDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ozgur OzmenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TRErzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a significant increase in number of obese pregnant women worldwide. Obese parturients undergoing cesarean section have a higher risk for hypotension and require higher doses of vasopressors following spinal anesthesia compared to nonobese parturients.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the maternal hemodynamic changes when combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is induced in the left lateral decubitus and sitting positions in obese pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, pregnant women with full-term gestation diagnosed as obese undergoing elective cesarean section were included. Two groups were formed: the CSEA was performed in left lateral position in group I (n = 50) and in sitting position in group II (n = 50). At the end of the CSEA procedure, patients were placed in the supine position. When the sensory block reached at the upper level of T6 dermatome, surgery was initiated. Hemodynamic, anesthetic and neonatal parameters were recorded.

resultsIn all patients, CSEA was successful and sufficient anesthesia was provided for surgery. Time to reach T6 dermatome sensory level in group II was found to be longer than group I (P = 0.011). At 20 min after spinal injection, the maximum sensory block level was similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of sensory block time and the time to requiring postoperative supplemental analgesics. There were no significant differences in terms of the volume of intravenous fluid administered, ephedrine and atropine requirements between groups. Both groups had similar systolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation values during surgery and postoperatively. While both groups had similar diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values during surgery and at the 1st postoperative hour, group II had lower DBP values at the 2nd postoperative hour compared with group I (P = 0.04).

conclusionLeft lateral decubitus and sitting positions during performance of CSEA lead to similar maternal hemodynamic changes in obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalHypotensionCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornObesityPregnancySitting PositionCesarean sectionHypotensionNeuraxial anesthesiaObesityPosition

Identifiers

PMID34159412
OpenAlexW3175868388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.