ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
Intermediate-term results of a prospective, multicenter study on remote programming sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sacral and Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation for the Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Overactive Bladder: Closing the Gaps in Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Parameter Selection.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Revision and Explantation After Permanent Sacral Neuromodulation for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Neuromodulation guide for the non-neuromodulator clinician: What it is and how it can benefit patients?Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel remote programming sacral neuromodulation (SNM) system (BetterStim system) in the treatment of patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) for 3 years.
methodsA total of 8 centers in China enrolled 84 patients with OAB. Following test stimulation 70 patients underwent implantation using BetterStim. All patients returned for follow-up at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. After that, the visits were conducted by telephone. Outcomes of voiding diaries, the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), questionnaires regarding OAB-related quality of life (OAB-qol), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each visit. The clinical therapeutic success was defined as ≥50% improvement from baseline in any of the voiding diary variables or average voids/day return to normal voiding (<8 voids/day). The analysis is a modified Completers analysis.
resultsAt the 36-month follow-up, the success rate was 79% for overall OAB symptoms, 69% for urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and 42% for urgency frequency (UF). The average number of voids/day decreased from 29.2±14.9 at baseline to 17.6±11.2 at 3 years, the average volume/void increased from 94.7±54.2 to 151.4±80.8 mL, the urgency reduced from 3.0±1.4 to 1.8±1.7 (all P<0.001). For patients with urge incontinence, mean leaking episodes/day decreased from 8.1±7.6 at baseline to 2.1±3.5 at three years (P<0.05). The devices were explanted in 8 (11.4%) patients. There were no remote programming-related AEs or device-related serious AEs that occurred.
conclusionsThe Intermediate-term results demonstrated that BetterStim SNM system with remote programming is safe and effective for patients with refractory OAB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.