ArticleScientific reports2021
Impact of boron and indium doping on the structural, electronic and optical properties of SnO
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photocatalytic Activity of Boron-Modified SnONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cluster-Assembled Hollow SnOACS omega · 2026Article
- Synthesis of Cu-Mo/TiOBeilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Chalcogen Doping in SnOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Vanadium and tantalum doping of tin dioxide: a theoretical study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Visible light activated SnORSC advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tin dioxide (SnO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.