Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158523›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Climate and the latitudinal limits of subtropical reef development.

Lauren T Toth, William F Precht, Alexander B Modys, Anastasios Stathakopoulos, Martha L Robbart, J Harold Hudson, Anton E Oleinik, Bernhard M Riegl, Eugene A Shinn, Richard B Aronson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren T TothU.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA. ltoth@usgs.gov.
William F PrechtMarine and Coastal Programs, Dial Cordy & Associates, Inc., Miami, FL, USA.
Alexander B ModysDepartment of Geosciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Anastasios StathakopoulosU.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Martha L RobbartMarine and Coastal Programs, Dial Cordy & Associates, Inc., Miami, FL, USA.
J Harold HudsonReef Tech, Miami, FL, USA.
Anton E OleinikDepartment of Geosciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Bernhard M RieglDepartment of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL, USA.
Eugene A ShinnCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
Richard B AronsonDepartment of Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, USA.
Florida Atlantic University · USSt. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science CenterFlorida Institute of Technology · USNova Southeastern University · USOldham Council · GBReef Environmental Education Foundation · USUniversity of South Florida St. Petersburg · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate plays a central role in coral-reef development, especially in marginal environments. The high-latitude reefs of southeast Florida are currently non-accreting, relict systems with low coral cover. This region also did not support the extensive Late Pleistocene reef development observed in many other locations around the world; however, there is evidence of significant reef building in southeast Florida during the Holocene. Using 146 radiometric ages from reefs extending ~ 120 km along Florida's southeast coast, we test the hypothesis that the latitudinal extent of Holocene reef development in this region was modulated by climatic variability. We demonstrate that although sea-level changes impacted rates of reef accretion and allowed reefs to backstep inshore as new habitats were flooded, sea level was not the ultimate cause of reef demise. Instead, we conclude that climate was the primary driver of the expansion and contraction of Florida's reefs during the Holocene. Reefs grew to 26.7° N in southeast Florida during the relatively warm, stable climate at the beginning of the Holocene Thermal Maximum (HTM) ~ 10,000 years ago, but subsequent cooling and increased frequency of winter cold fronts were associated with the equatorward contraction of reef building. By ~ 7800 years ago, actively accreting reefs only extended to 26.1° N. Reefs further contracted to 25.8° N after 5800 years ago, and by 3000 years ago reef development had terminated throughout southern Florida (24.5-26.7° N). Modern warming is unlikely to simply reverse this trend, however, because the climate of the Anthropocene will be fundamentally different from the HTM. By increasing the frequency and intensity of both warm and cold extreme-weather events, contemporary climate change will instead amplify conditions inimical to reef development in marginal reef environments such as southern Florida, making them more likely to continue to deteriorate than to resume accretion in the future.

Identifiers

PMID34158523
PMCPMC8219804
OpenAlexW3176258217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.