ReviewNature communications2021
An actionable anti-racism plan for geoscience organizations.
Review in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching critical histories of microbiology: two case studies.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Forward steps, lingering gaps: gender representation among distinguished speakers at professional conferences.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Understanding the Lived Experiences of the members of the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research through Collins' Matrix of Domination Framework.CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy.Science advances · 2023Review
- Junior scientists spotlight social bonds in seminars for diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM.PloS one · 2023Article
- Accelerating ethics, empathy, and equity in geographic information science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Colonial history and global economics distort our understanding of deep-time biodiversity.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- "Maybe this is just not the place for me:" Gender harassment and discrimination in the geosciences.PloS one · 2022Article
- 50 Years of Women in Cell Biology: Where have we been? Where are we going?Molecular biology of the cell · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geoscience organizations shape the discipline. They influence attitudes and expectations, set standards, and provide benefits to their members. Today, racism and discrimination limit the participation of, and promote hostility towards, members of minoritized groups within these critical geoscience spaces. This is particularly harmful for Black, Indigenous, and other people of color in geoscience and is further exacerbated along other axes of marginalization, including disability status and gender identity. Here we present a twenty-point anti-racism plan that organizations can implement to build an inclusive, equitable and accessible geoscience community. Enacting it will combat racism, discrimination, and the harassment of all members.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.