Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158405›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2022

Impact of the national home safety equipment scheme 'Safe At Home' on hospital admissions for unintentional injury in children under 5: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.

Trevor Hill, Carol Coupland, Denise Kendrick, Matthew Jones, Ashley Akbari, Sarah Rodgers, Michael Craig Watson, Edward Tyrrell, Sheila Merrill, Elizabeth Orton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of systematically delivered evidence-based home safety promotion to improve child home safety practices: a controlled before-and-after study.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Trevor HillDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Carol CouplandDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Denise KendrickDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Matthew JonesDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ashley AkbariMedical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Sarah RodgersPublic Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Michael Craig WatsonInstitute of Health Promotion and Education, Lichfield, UK.
Edward TyrrellDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sheila MerrillRoyal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), Edgbaston, UK.
Elizabeth OrtonDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK elizabeth.orton@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-8846
University of Nottingham · GBRoyal Society · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintentional home injuries are a leading cause of preventable death in young children. Safety education and equipment provision improve home safety practices, but their impact on injuries is less clear. Between 2009 and 2011, a national home safety equipment scheme was implemented in England (Safe At Home), targeting high-injury-rate areas and socioeconomically disadvantaged families with children under 5. This provided a 'natural experiment' for evaluating the scheme's impact on hospital admissions for unintentional injuries.

methodsControlled interrupted time series analysis of unintentional injury hospital admission rates in small areas (Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs)) in England where the scheme was implemented (intervention areas, n=9466) and matched with LSOAs in England and Wales where it was not implemented (control areas, n=9466), with subgroup analyses by density of equipment provision.

results57 656 homes receiving safety equipment were included in the analysis. In the 2 years after the scheme ended, monthly admission rates declined in intervention areas (-0.33% (-0.47% to -0.18%)) but did not decline in control areas (0.04% (-0.11%-0.19%), p value for difference in trend=0.001). Greater reductions in admission rates were seen as equipment provision density increased. Effects were not maintained beyond 2 years after the scheme ended.

conclusionsA national home safety equipment scheme was associated with a reduction in injury-related hospital admissions in children under 5 in the 2 years after the scheme ended. Providing a higher number of items of safety equipment appears to be more effective in reducing injury rates than providing fewer items.

Indexed as

Accidents, HomeWounds and InjuriesChildChild, PreschoolHospitalsHumansInfantInterrupted Time Series AnalysisProtective DevicesSafetyaccidentsepidemiologyinjurypublic health

Identifiers

PMID34158405
PMCPMC8666806
OpenAlexW3173388278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.