Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158296›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Models of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

Daniela Costa, Eduardo B Cruz, Ana M Rodrigues, Daniela Gonçalves-Bradley, Luís A Gomes, Helena Donato, Carla Nunes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela CostaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal dcosta.ft@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8469-6356
Eduardo B CruzComprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1812-1815
Ana M RodriguesComprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Daniela Gonçalves-BradleyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Luís A GomesComprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Helena DonatoDocumentation and Scientific Information Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-1268
Carla NunesNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition with associated high disability and healthcare costs. Evidence of major gaps in the implementation of evidence-based interventions in people with knee OA led several healthcare systems to implement models of care (MoCs) in order to improve knowledge translation and guaranty their economic sustainability. Nevertheless, there are few studies that analyse the existing body of evidence of MoCs for patients with knee OA in primary healthcare settings. Therefore, we aim to identify MoCs developed for patients with knee OA implemented in primary healthcare and, analyse their core components and outcomes. This scoping review will create knowledge about the components and outcomes of these MoCs which, in the future, will facilitate their transferability to practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include studies that developed and implemented an MoC for people with knee OA in primary healthcare. We will use the PCC mnemonic, being 'Population'-people with Knee OA, 'Concept'-the MoCs and 'Context'-the primary healthcare setting. We will conduct the search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, as well as grey literature databases and relevant institutions and organisations websites, for articles published after 2000. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. We will evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies with the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool and apply a data abstraction form to describe and interpret the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a secondary analysis, this scoping review does not require ethical approval. Findings will be published in peer-review journal, presented in scientific conferences and as a summary through primary healthcare units.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeDelivery of Health CareHumansPeer ReviewPrimary Health CareResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicimplementationmodels of service deliveryosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID34158296
PMCPMC8220471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.