Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158115›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Virtual external implementation facilitation: successful methods for remotely engaging groups in quality improvement.

Christine W Hartmann, Ryann L Engle, Camilla B Pimentel, Whitney L Mills, Valerie A Clark, Virginia C Keleher, Princess Nash, Corilyn Ott, Therasia Roland, Sharon Sloup and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christine W HartmannCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA, 01730, USA. Christine.Hartmann@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-0601
Ryann L EngleCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Camilla B PimentelCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Whitney L MillsCenter for Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, 02908, USA.
Valerie A ClarkCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Virginia C KeleherTuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35404, USA.
Princess NashTuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35404, USA.
Corilyn OttTuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35404, USA.
Therasia RolandCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Sharon SloupTuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35404, USA.
Barbara FrankB&F Consulting, 69 Locust Terrace, Warren, RI, 02885, USA.
Cathie BradyB&F Consulting, 69 Locust Terrace, Warren, RI, 02885, USA.
A Lynn SnowTuscaloosa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35404, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively little guidance exists on how to use virtual implementation facilitation to successfully implement evidence-based practices and innovations into clinical programs. Yet virtual methods are increasingly common. They have potentially wider reach, emergent public health situations necessitate their use, and restrictions on resources can make them more attractive. We therefore outline a set of principles for virtual external implementation facilitation and a series of recommendations based on extensive experience successfully using virtual external implementation facilitation in a national program. MODEL AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Success in virtual external implementation facilitation may be achieved by facilitators applying three overarching principles: pilot everything, incorporate a model, and prioritize metacognition. Five practical principles also help: plan in advance, communicate in real time, build relationships, engage participants, and construct a virtual room for participants. We present eight concrete suggestions for enacting the practical principles: (1) assign key facilitation roles to facilitation team members to ensure the program runs smoothly; (2) create small cohorts of participants so they can have meaningful interactions; (3) provide clarity and structure for all participant interactions; (4) structure program content to ensure key points are described, reinforced, and practiced; (5) use visuals to supplement audio content; (6) build activities into the agenda that enable participants to immediately apply knowledge at their own sites, separate from the virtual experience; (7) create backup plans whenever possible; and (8) engage all participants in the program. These principles represent a novel conceptualization of virtual external implementation facilitation, giving structure to a process that has been, to date, inadequately described. The associated actions are demonstrably useful in supporting the principles and offer teams interested in virtual external implementation facilitation concrete methods by which to ensure success. Our examples stem from experiences in healthcare. But the principles can, in theory, be applied to virtual external implementation facilitation regardless of setting, as they and the associated actions are not setting specific.

Indexed as

External facilitationImplementation facilitationMethodsQuality improvementRemoteStrategiesVirtual

Identifiers

PMID34158115
PMCPMC8218278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.