Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158078›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Role of hippocampal location and radiation dose in glioblastoma patients with hippocampal atrophy.

Clara Le Fèvre, Xue Cheng, Marie-Pierre Loit, Audrey Keller, Hélène Cebula, Delphine Antoni, Alicia Thiery, Jean-Marc Constans, François Proust, Georges Noel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Recurrence analysis of glioblastoma cases based on distance and dose information.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clara Le FèvreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-5437
Xue ChengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Marie-Pierre Loit
Audrey Keller
Hélène CebulaNeurosurgery Service, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Delphine AntoniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Alicia ThieryStatistic Department, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Marc ConstansRadiology Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 1 rond-point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 1, France.
François ProustNeurosurgery Service, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Georges NoelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France. c.lefevre@icans.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hippocampus is a critical organ for irradiation. Thus, we explored changes in hippocampal volume according to the dose delivered and the location relative to the glioblastoma.

methodsAll patients were treated for glioblastoma with surgery, concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and adjuvant temozolomide. Hippocampi were retrospectively delineated on three MRIs, performed at baseline, at the time of relapse, and on the last MRI available at the end of follow-up. A total of 98, 96, and 82 hippocampi were measured in the 49 patients included in the study, respectively. The patients were stratified into three subgroups according to the dose delivered to 40% of the hippocampus. In the group 1 (n = 6), the hippocampal D

resultsRegardless of the time of measurement, homolateral hippocampal volumes were significantly lower than those contralateral to the tumor. Regardless of the side, the volumes at the last MRI were significantly lower than those measured at baseline. There was a significant correlation among the decrease in hippocampal volume regardless of its side, and D

conclusionsThere was a significant relationship between the radiotherapy dose and decrease in hippocampal volume. However, at the lowest doses, the hippocampi seem to exhibit an adaptive increase in their volume, which could indicate a plasticity effect. Consequently, shielding at least one hippocampus by delivering the lowest possible dose is recommended so that cognitive function can be preserved. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtrophyBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedDose effectGlioblastomaHippocampusVolume

Identifiers

PMID34158078
PMCPMC8220779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.