Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34158017›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Early intervention, treatment and rehabilitation of employees with common mental disorders by using psychotherapeutic consultation at work: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (friaa project).

Jeannette Weber, Peter Angerer, Lorena Brenner, Jolanda Brezinski, Sophia Chrysanthou, Yesim Erim, Manuel Feißt, Marieke Hansmann, Sinja Hondong, Franziska Maria Kessemeier and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Psychotherapeutic consultation at work: associations between company size and psychosomatic health].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  9. [Rationale, models, and impact of workplace-based psychotherapeutic services].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
  10. [Mental health problems among employees: service use and costs to the German healthcare system].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of a Group Therapy for Work-Related Mental Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Conceptual Framework of a Psychotherapeutic Consultation in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannette WeberInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Jeannette.Weber@hhu.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-7925
Peter AngererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lorena BrennerResearch Group Psychosomatic Rehabilitation, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Jolanda BrezinskiInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sophia ChrysanthouResearch Group Psychosomatic Rehabilitation, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Yesim ErimDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Manuel FeißtInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marieke HansmannInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim Foundation, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany.
Sinja HondongDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Franziska Maria KessemeierInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 49, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Reinhold KilianDepartment Psychiatry II, Section of Health Economics and Psychiatric Services Research, Ulm University, Lindenallee 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Christina KloseInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker KöllnerResearch Group Psychosomatic Rehabilitation, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Fiona KohlInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Regina KrisamInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph KrögerInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim Foundation, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany.
Anja SanderInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ute Beate SchröderFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Division 3 Work and Health Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Nöldnerstr, 40-42 10317, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf StegmannFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Division 3 Work and Health Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Nöldnerstr, 40-42 10317, Berlin, Germany.
Uta WegewitzFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Division 3 Work and Health Unit 3.5 Evidence-based Occupational Health, Workplace Health Management, Nöldnerstr, 40-42 10317, Berlin, Germany.
Harald GündelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Eva RothermundDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Kristin HerrmannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Hildesheim · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902CBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902DBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902EBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902FBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GX1902H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon mental disorders are one of the leading causes for sickness absence and early retirement due to reduced health. Furthermore, a treatment gap for common mental disorders has been described worldwide. Within this study, psychotherapeutic consultation at work defined as a tailored, module-based and work-related psychotherapeutic intervention will be applied to improve mental health care.

methodsThis study comprises a randomised controlled multicentre trial with 1:1 allocation to an intervention and control group. In total, 520 employees with common mental disorders shall be recruited from companies being located around five study centres in Germany. Besides care as usual, the intervention group will receive up to 17 sessions of psychotherapy. The first session will include basics diagnostics and medical indication of treatment and the second session will include work-related diagnostics. Then, participants of the intervention group may receive work-related psychotherapeutic consultation for up to ten sessions. Further psychotherapeutic consultation during return to work for up to five sessions will be offered where appropriate. The control group will receive care as usual and the first intervention session of basic diagnostics and medical indication of treatment. After enrolment to the study, participants will be followed up after nine (first follow-up) and fifteen (second follow-up) months. Self-reported days of sickness absence within the last 6 months at the second follow-up will be used as the primary outcome and self-efficacy at the second follow-up as the secondary outcome. Furthermore, a cost-benefit assessment related to costs of common mental disorders for social insurances and companies will be performed. DISCUSSION: Psychotherapeutic consultation at work represents a low threshold care model aiming to overcome treatment gaps for employees with common mental disorders. If successfully implemented and evaluated, it might serve as a role model to the care of employees with common mental disorders and might be adopted in standard care in cooperation with sickness and pension insurances in Germany.

trial registrationThe friaa project was registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) at 01.03.2021 (DRKS00023049): https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023049 .

Indexed as

Mental DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationSelf EfficacyDepressionMental healthPsychotherapyReturn to workSelf-efficacySickness absenceWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID34158017
PMCPMC8218449
OpenAlexW3174783180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.