Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34157997›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound.

Pascale Brasier-Lutz, Claudia Jäggi-Wickes, Sabine Schaedelin, Rosemarie Burian, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Rosanna Zanetti-Dällenbach

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02358837 (Improving Breast Cancer Diagnostics by Novel Sonographic Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02358837 completednot on this map

Improving Breast Cancer Diagnostics by Novel Sonographic Techniques

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2011 to 2015Enrolled236ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pascale Brasier-LutzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudia Jäggi-WickesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabine SchaedelinDepartment of Clinical Research, Statistics and Data Management, University Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Rosemarie BurianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Cora-Ann SchoenenbergerDepartment of Chemistry, University Basel, BioPark 1096, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Rosanna Zanetti-DällenbachGynecology/Gynecologic Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4085, Basel, Switzerland. rosanna.zanetti@claraspital.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2754-5943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study prospectively investigates the agreement between radial (r-US) and meander-like (m-US) breast ultrasound with regard to lesion location, lesion size, morphological characteristics and final BI-RADS classification of individual breast lesions.

methodsEach patient of a consecutive, unselected, mixed collective received a dual ultrasound examination.

resultsThe agreement between r-US and m-US for lesion location ranged from good (lesion to mammilla distance ICC 0.64; lesion to skin distance ICC 0.72) to substantial (clock-face localization κ 0.70). For lesion size the agreement was good (diameter ICC 0.72; volume ICC 0.69), for lesion margin and architectural distortion it was substantial (κ 0.68 and 0.70, respectively). Most importantly, there was a substantial agreement (κ 0.76) in the final BI-RADS classification between r-US and m-US.

conclusionsOur recent comparison of radial and meander-like breast US revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of the two scanning methods was comparable. In this study, we observe a high degree of agreement between m-US and r-US for the lesion description (location, size, morphology) and final BI-RADS classification. These findings corroborate that r-US is a suitable alternative to m-US in daily clinical practice. Trial registration NCT02358837. Registered January 2015, retrospectively registered https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT02358837&cntry=&state=&city=&dist =.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSupine PositionUltrasonography, MammaryYoung AdultAgreementBI-RADS final assessmentBreast ultrasoundMeander-like breast ultrasoundRadial breast ultrasoundReliability

Identifiers

PMID34157997
PMCPMC8220682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.