Trial reportBMC public health2021
Process evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a primary care based three-armed randomized controlled trial using self-monitoring of steps with and without counseling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02374788 (Health Promotion in the Primary Care Setting- an Evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a Structured Behaviour Change Program Focusing on Physical Activity in Persons With Pre- and Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health Promotion in the Primary Care Setting- an Evaluation of the Sophia Step Study- a Structured Behaviour Change Program Focusing on Physical Activity in Persons With Pre- and Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a three-armed randomised controlled trial using self-monitoring of daily steps with and without counselling in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes-the Sophia Step Study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Trial
- Self-Reported Depression, Anxiety, Stress, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Diabetes Distress During a 2-Year Pedometer-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of primary care & community healthTrial
- Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity in People With Young-Onset (Aged 18-40 Years) Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Exploring Perceptions, Barriers, and Facilitators of Participation in an Exercise Snack Intervention Among U.S. Office Workers: Findings From a Pilot Study.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2025Article
- The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Physical Activity Patterns among Individuals with Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes across Two Years-A Longitudinal Latent Class Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults With Type 2 DiabetesFrontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDescribing implementation features of an intervention is required to compare interventions and to inform policy and best practice. The aim of this study was to conduct a process evaluation of the first 12 months of the Sophia Step Study: a primary care based RCT evaluating a multicomponent (self-monitoring of daily steps plus counseling) and a single component (self-monitoring of steps only) physical activity intervention to standard care on cardiometabolic health.
methodsThe evaluation was guided by the Medical Research Council Guidance for complex interventions. To describe the implementation communication with the health professionals implementing the interventions, attendance records and tracking of days with self-monitored pedometer-determined steps were used. Change in physical activity behaviour was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months as daily steps by accelerometry.
resultsDuring April 2013 to January 2018 188 participants were randomized and intervened directly after inclusion. Response rate was 49% and drop out was 10%. A majority, 78%, had type 2 diabetes and 22% were diagnosed with prediabetes. Mean [Standard deviation (SD)] body mass index was 30.4 (4.4) kg/m
conclusionsApplying self-monitoring of steps is a feasible method to implement as support for physical activity in the primary care setting both with and without counseling support.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02374788 . Registered 2 March 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.