Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34157450›Full record

ArticlePractical radiation oncology

Virtual Away Rotations Increase Access to Radiation Oncology.

James Janopaul-Naylor, David Qian, Mohammad Khan, Susan Brown, Jolinta Lin, Yusef Syed, Ashley Schlafstein, Naba Ali, Joseph Shelton, Jeffrey Bradley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Digital transfer in radiation oncology education for medical students-single-center data and systemic review of the literature.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James Janopaul-NaylorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: jjanopa@emory.edu02.
David QianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Mohammad KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Susan BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jolinta LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yusef SyedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ashley SchlafsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Naba AliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joseph SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jeffrey BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pretesh PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic altered the workplace for medical education. As restrictions ease, the opportunities provided by virtual rotations remain. Radiation oncology rotations based on virtual participation with patients (consultations, follow-ups, and brachytherapy), contouring and reviewing external beam plans, didactics, and unstructured office hours have been well received at multiple institutions. Virtual rotations decrease barriers to access including lack of a radiation oncology department at one's home institute and the high cost of travel and housing. Furthermore, rotations can be adapted to preclinical students and those with prior radiation oncology rotation experience. However, the virtual format creates and exacerbates several challenges including technical difficulties with electronic medical record or treatment planning software, lack of the spontaneous interactions common to in-person rotations, and unexpected delays in the clinic. We recommend early scheduled time with information technology services to troubleshoot any potential issues, scheduled office hours with faculty and videoconferencing with nonphysician team members to mitigate omission of in-person introductions, and provision of complete contact information for all staff scheduled to meet with students to facilitate communication when unexpected clinic issues arise. Although we are all excited for quarantine restrictions to safely be lifted, we support the continued development of virtual away rotations as a flexible, more affordable option to increase exposure to the field.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, MedicalRadiation OncologyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34157450
PMCPMC8412460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.