Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34157187›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2021

Predictive factors of smell recovery in a clinical series of 288 coronavirus disease 2019 patients with olfactory dysfunction.

Sven Saussez, Shilpee Sharma, Anaïs Thiriard, Véronique Olislagers, Inès Vu Duc, Serge-D Le Bon, Mohamad Khalife, Stephane Hans, Giacomo De Riu, Claire Hopkins and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19-related chemosensory changes: Findings from a prospective national database.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Review
  14. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Sven SaussezCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3655-1854
Shilpee SharmaInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
Anaïs ThiriardInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
Véronique OlislagersInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
Inès Vu DucInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
Serge-D Le BonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-3404
Mohamad KhalifeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium.
Stephane HansDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Giacomo De RiuMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Claire HopkinsGuy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jerome R LechienCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-0845
Luigi A VairaMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-145X
Arnaud MarchantInstitute for Medical Immunology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Charleroi, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Sassari · ITEpicura · BEGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aim was to evaluate potential predictive factors of smell recovery in a clinical series of 288 patients presenting olfactory dysfunction (OD) related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Potential correlations were sought between epidemiological, clinical and immunological characteristics of patients and the persistence of OD at 60 days.

methodsCOVID-19 positive patients presenting OD were prospectively recruited from three European hospitals. Baseline clinical and olfactory evaluations were performed within the first 2 weeks after OD onset and repeated at 30 and 60 days. In a subgroup of patients, anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies were measured in serum, saliva and nasal secretions at 60 days.

resultsA total of 288 COVID-19 patients with OD were included in the study. Two weeks after the onset of the loss of smell, 52.4% of patients had OD on psychophysical tests, including 113 cases (39.2%) of anosmia and 38 cases (13.2%) of hyposmia. At 60-day follow-up, 25.4% of the patients presented persistent OD. There was no significant correlation between sex, age, viral load on nasopharyngeal swab or COVID-19 severity and poor olfactory outcome. In a subgroup of 63 patients, it was demonstrated that patients with poor olfactory outcomes at 60 days had lower levels of salivary and nasal immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG1, but similar levels of antibodies in the serum.

conclusionsNo clinical markers predicted the evolution of OD at 60 days. Patients with poor olfactory outcome at 60 days had lower saliva and nasal antibodies, suggesting a role for local immune responses in the persistence of COVID-19 related OD.

Indexed as

COVID-19Olfaction DisordersAnosmiaHumansSARS-CoV-2SmellCOVID-19IgGIgG1olfactory dysfunctionSARS-COV-2

Identifiers

PMID34157187
PMCPMC8444937
OpenAlexW3173296057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.