ArticlePloS one2021
Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling to Uncover Latent Research Topics and Trends in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Bibliometric Review.JMIR cancer · 2026Review
- Real-world costs per life-year of targeted therapy, incidence, lifetime health impact, and medical costs of renal cell carcinoma in Taiwan.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Renal Cell Carcinoma: Prognosis in the Era of Targeted Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Observational
- Visual presentation of age differences in relative survival of hematological neoplasms in Sweden and the neighboring countries.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Low nuclear expression of HIF-hydroxylases PHD2/EGLN1 and PHD3/EGLN3 are associated with poor recurrence-free survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Survival in Kidney and Bladder Cancers in Four Nordic Countries through a Half Century.Cancers · 2023Article
- Survival in gastric and esophageal cancers in the Nordic countries through a half century.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Long-term survival trends for primary liver and pancreatic cancers in the Nordic countries.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022Article
- Review
- Cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancer incidence and survival trends in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with implications to treatment.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Incidence and survival in laryngeal and lung cancers in Finland and Sweden through a half century.PloS one · 2022Article
- Survival in bladder and upper urinary tract cancers in Finland and Sweden through 50 years.PloS one · 2022Article
- Broussochalcone A Induces Apoptosis in Human Renal Cancer Cells via ROS Level Elevation and Activation of FOXO3 Signaling Pathway.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.