Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156895›Full record

ArticleTumori2022

Improving outcomes of surgery in advanced infiltrative thymic tumours: the benefits of multidisciplinary approach.

Andrea Billè, Rajdeep Bilkhu, Giulia Benedetti, Gianluca Lucchese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tumori, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea BillèDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-4174
Rajdeep BilkhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital London, London, UK.
Giulia BenedettiDepartment of Radiology, Guy's Hospital London, London, UK.
Gianluca LuccheseDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Guy's Hospital London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor stage III or IVa thymic tumours, a multimodality approach is recommended. The role of surgery is to achieve complete resection.

aimTo present the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for stage III or IVa thymoma.

methodsRetrospective review of patients undergoing open surgery for stage III or IVa thymoma between 2016 and 2020 at a single centre was performed. Preoperative imaging, treatment plan, surgical approach, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

resultsForty-seven patients underwent surgery for thymoma. Patients with clinical stage I/II thymoma or minimally invasive thymectomy were excluded. Thirteen patients with clinical stage III or IVa were included. Median sternotomy approach was used in four patients, of which one was redo sternotomy; a hemi-clamshell in four; and a combination of approaches in the remaining five patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Four patients had postoperative complications. Complete resection was achieved in all but two patients. At a median follow-up of 17.9 months, all patients were alive with no evidence of recurrence except one who died 4 months after surgery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.

conclusionsSurgery for stage III and IVa thymoma is safe and can be achieved with complete macroscopic resection. To obtain adequate exposure of all structures involved in the tumour, combined surgical approaches can be used with no increased morbidity. The majority of patients, even after extrapleural pneumonectomy, did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy and had no evidence of local relapse.

Indexed as

COVID-19ThymomaThymus NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesdiaphragmpericardiumreconstructionresectionThymoma

Identifiers

PMID34156895
PMCPMC9500164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.