ArticleACS sensors2021
Detecting Attomolar DNA-Damaging Anticancer Drug Activity in Cell Lysates with Electrochemical DNA Devices.
Article in ACS sensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Robust Equivalent Circuit Model for DNA-Mediated Electrochemistry.ChemPlusChem · 2026Article
- Air-Stable Cobalt-Semiquinone Radical Complexes on Carbon Nanotubes: A Redox Switch for Anion Response.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Unraveling systemic responses to NQO1-activated IB-DNQ and Rucaparib single and dual agent therapy in triple-negative breast cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- An overview of the past decade of bufalin in the treatment of refractory and drug-resistant cancers: current status, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we utilize electrochemical DNA devices to quantify and understand the cancer-specific DNA-damaging activity of an emerging drug in cellular lysates at femtomolar and attomolar concentrations. Isobutyl-deoxynyboquinone (IB-DNQ), a potent and tumor-selective NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) bioactivatable drug, was prepared and biochemically verified in cancer cells highly expressing NQO1 (NQO1+) and knockdowns with low NQO1 expression (NQO1-) by Western blot, NQO1 activity analysis, survival assays, oxygen consumption rate, extracellular acidification rate, and peroxide production. Lysates from these cells and the IB-DNQ drug were then introduced to a chip system bearing an array of DNA-modified electrodes, and their DNA-damaging activity was quantified by changes in DNA-mediated electrochemistry arising from base-excision repair. Device-level controls of NQO1 activity and kinetic analysis were used to verify and further understand the IB-DNQ activity. A 380 aM IB-DNQ limit of detection and a 1.3 fM midpoint of damage were observed in NQO1+ lysates, both metrics 2 orders of magnitude lower than NQO1- lysates, indicating the high IB-DNQ potency and selectivity for NQO1+ cancers. The device-level damage midpoint concentration in NQO1+ lysates was over 8 orders of magnitude lower than cell survival benchmarks, likely due to poor IB-DNQ cellular uptake, demonstrating that these devices can identify promising drugs requiring improved cell permeability. Ultimately, these results indicate the noteworthy potency and selectivity of IB-DNQ and the high sensitivity and precision of electrochemical DNA devices to analyze agents/drugs involved in DNA-damaging chemotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.