Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156760›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2021

Microfluidic processing of stem cells for autologous cell replacement.

Nicholas E Stone, Andrew P Voigt, Robert F Mullins, Todd Sulchek, Budd A Tucker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. iPSCs-Based Therapy for Trabecular Meshwork.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Outer Retinal Cell Replacement: Putting the Pieces Together.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas E StoneThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5276-3219
Andrew P VoigtInstitute for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8107-8317
Robert F MullinsInstitute for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-0891
Todd SulchekThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-6293
Budd A TuckerInstitute for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-1742
University of Iowa · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GEYER, PAMELA K., LENTZ, STEVEN R · 1985 to 2020
$15.9M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM139776 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Gordon F Buchanan · 2021 to 2026
$6.4M
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of mutations that cause inherited retinal degenerationsR01EY026008 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI STONE, EDWIN M, TUCKER, BUDD A · 2016 to 2022
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026008NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007337NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous photoreceptor cell replacement is one of the most promising approaches currently under development for the treatment of inherited retinal degenerative blindness. Unlike endogenous stem cell populations, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be differentiated into both rod and cone photoreceptors in high numbers, making them ideal for this application. That said, in addition to photoreceptor cells, state of the art retinal differentiation protocols give rise to all of the different cell types of the normal retina, the majority of which are not required and may in fact hinder successful photoreceptor cell replacement. As such, following differentiation photoreceptor cell enrichment will likely be required. In addition, to prevent the newly generated photoreceptor cells from suffering the same fate as the patient's original cells, correction of the patient's disease-causing genetic mutations will be necessary. In this review we discuss literature pertaining to the use of different cell sorting and transfection approaches with a focus on the development and use of novel next generation microfluidic devices. We will discuss how gold standard strategies have been used, the advantages and disadvantages of each, and how novel microfluidic platforms can be incorporated into the clinical manufacturing pipeline to reduce the complexity, cost, and regulatory burden associated with clinical grade production of photoreceptor cells for autologous cell replacement.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsRetinal DegenerationCell DifferentiationHumansMicrofluidicsRetinaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cellsautologous stem cell transplantationinduced pluripotent stem cellsretinaretinal photoreceptorsstem/progenitor cell

Identifiers

PMID34156760
PMCPMC8459636
OpenAlexW3175314200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.