ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2021
Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis reveals the effects of microbial inoculants on the biomass and diversity of soil microbial communities.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Harnessing plant-exuded prebiotics as a next-generation strategy for sustainable agriculture.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Bacterial Community Expansion and Nutrient Activation Underlie Yield Improvement Following Diazotrophic Inoculant Application in Paddy Soil.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Review
- Leaf- and root-associated bacterial communities differ in their resistance and resilience to N disturbance in a temperate steppe.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Rethinking microbial biopesticide development and uptake.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Characterization of Rhizosphere Streptomyces hachijoensis JCK-6068 as a Multifunctional Agent for the Control of Soil-Borne Fungal and Oomycete Diseases.The plant pathology journal · 2026Article
- Eco-functional deployment of indigenous nitrogen-fixing microbes to enable temperate crop cultivation in tropical climates.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Developing Effective Bioinoculant and Engineering Plant Microbiome for Climate Resilient Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Future Roadmap.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Stable foliar colonization of nanocoated nitrogen-fixing bacteria enhances crop nitrogen supply.Nature food · 2026Article
- Key Challenges in Plant Microbiome Research in the Next Decade.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Harnessing Beneficial Microbes and Sensor Technologies for Sustainable Smart Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Harnessing the Sorghum Microbiome for Enhancing Crop Productivity and Food Security Towards Sustainable Agriculture in Smallholder Farming.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Quantification and Determination of Compatible Bacterial Consortia.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Microbiome matters: how transplantation methods and donor origins shape the successful restoration of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Co-Inoculation of Non-Symbiotic Bacteria Bacillus and Paraburkholderia Can Improve the Soybean Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Parameters.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Advances in Research on Soil-Borne Diseases of Medicinal Plants and Their Prevention and Control.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Selective recruitment of beneficial microbes in the rhizosphere of maize affected by microbial inoculants, farming practice, and seasonal variations.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of microbial tools to sustainably increase agricultural production has received significant attention from researchers, industries and policymakers. Over the past decade, the market access and development of microbial products have been accelerated by (i) the recent advances in plant-associated microbiome science, (ii) the pressure from consumers and policymakers for increasing crop productivity and reducing the use of agrochemicals, (iii) the rising threats of biotic and abiotic stresses, (iv) the loss of efficacy of some agrochemicals and plant breeding programs and (v) the calls for agriculture to contribute towards mitigating climate change. Although the sector is still in its infancy, the path towards effective microbial products is taking shape and the global market of these products has increased faster than that of agrochemicals. Promising results from using microbes either as biofertilizers or biopesticides have been continually reported, fuelling optimism and high expectations for the sector. However, some limitations, often related to low efficacy and inconsistent performance in field conditions, urgently need to be addressed to promote a wider use of microbial tools. We propose that advances in in situ microbiome manipulation approaches, such as the use of products containing synthetic microbial communities and novel prebiotics, have great potential to overcome some of these current constraints. Much more progress is expected in the development of microbial inoculants as areas such as synthetic biology and nano-biotechnology advance. If key technical, translational and regulatory issues are addressed, microbial tools will not only play an important role in sustainably boosting agricultural production over the next few decades but also contribute towards other sustainable development goals, including job creation and mitigation of the impacts of climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.