Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156661›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022

Re-amputation and survival following toe amputation: outcome data from a tertiary referral centre.

Patrick M Collins, Doireann P Joyce, Ellen S O'Beirn, Ramy Elkady, Emily Boyle, Bridget Egan, Sean Tierney

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05804565 (Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Metatarsal Method of Transection Using Bone Cutters or Bone Saw on Outcomes After Ray Amputation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05804565 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Metatarsal Method of Transection Using Bone Cutters or Bone Saw on Outcomes After Ray Amputation (MetaMet)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College Hospital GalwayRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetic Foot, Gangrene, Limb, Wound InfectionArmsBone Saw, Bone Cutter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick M CollinsDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-7516
Doireann P JoyceDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3723-6810
Ellen S O'BeirnDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Ramy ElkadyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Emily BoyleDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-6329
Bridget EganDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Sean TierneyDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. stierney@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-7214
Tallaght University Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeToe amputation is a commonly performed procedure for irreversible foot sepsis. However, outcome and predictors of outcome are poorly understood. Our aim was to determine survival and rate of progression to further amputation following index toe amputation.

methodsConsecutive patients between 2010 and 2015 were included. Progression to further minor amputation, major amputation or death was recorded. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were undertaken to determine independent predictors of outcome and survival.

resultsOne hundred forty-six patients were included, with mean age of 65 years. Fifty-five (37.7%) patients underwent hallux amputation, while 91 (62.3%) underwent amputation of non-hallux digit(s). Following index toe amputation, 63 (43.2%) patients progressed to further minor or major ipsilateral amputation, median time to which was 36 months. Twenty-one patients (14.4%) progressed to major ipsilateral amputation. Patients undergoing index non-hallux amputation were significantly more likely to require further minor amputation (P = 0.050); however, the rate of major amputation between hallux (14.5%) and non-hallux (14.3%) groups was similar. Overall, 5-year ipsilateral amputation-free (iAFS) was 39.6 ± 4.1%, ipsilateral major amputation-free (iMAFS) was 55.9 ± 4.1% and overall survival (OS) was 64.3 ± 4.0% and did not differ between index amputation sites.

conclusionAlmost half of patients undergoing toe amputation required further digital amputation. However, limb preservation rates are high, and a majority of patients are alive at 5-year follow-up. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients undergoing hallux and non-hallux primary procedures. Overall, increasing age remains the only independent predictor of iMAFS and OS.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootAgedAmputation, SurgicalHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersToesTreatment OutcomeMinor amputationRe-amputationSurvivalVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID34156661
OpenAlexW3175513792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.