ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022
Re-amputation and survival following toe amputation: outcome data from a tertiary referral centre.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05804565 (Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Metatarsal Method of Transection Using Bone Cutters or Bone Saw on Outcomes After Ray Amputation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Metatarsal Method of Transection Using Bone Cutters or Bone Saw on Outcomes After Ray Amputation (MetaMet)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Operation Techniques and Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Undergoing Minor Amputations-A Cohort Study.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
- Synchronous Retrograde Replantation Method for the Repair of Completely Severed Toes: A Four-Year Follow-Up.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-driven discovery of novel therapeutic targets in diabetic foot ulcers.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Unplanned Higher-Level Re-Amputation and Mortality after Lower Extremity Amputation in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeToe amputation is a commonly performed procedure for irreversible foot sepsis. However, outcome and predictors of outcome are poorly understood. Our aim was to determine survival and rate of progression to further amputation following index toe amputation.
methodsConsecutive patients between 2010 and 2015 were included. Progression to further minor amputation, major amputation or death was recorded. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were undertaken to determine independent predictors of outcome and survival.
resultsOne hundred forty-six patients were included, with mean age of 65 years. Fifty-five (37.7%) patients underwent hallux amputation, while 91 (62.3%) underwent amputation of non-hallux digit(s). Following index toe amputation, 63 (43.2%) patients progressed to further minor or major ipsilateral amputation, median time to which was 36 months. Twenty-one patients (14.4%) progressed to major ipsilateral amputation. Patients undergoing index non-hallux amputation were significantly more likely to require further minor amputation (P = 0.050); however, the rate of major amputation between hallux (14.5%) and non-hallux (14.3%) groups was similar. Overall, 5-year ipsilateral amputation-free (iAFS) was 39.6 ± 4.1%, ipsilateral major amputation-free (iMAFS) was 55.9 ± 4.1% and overall survival (OS) was 64.3 ± 4.0% and did not differ between index amputation sites.
conclusionAlmost half of patients undergoing toe amputation required further digital amputation. However, limb preservation rates are high, and a majority of patients are alive at 5-year follow-up. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients undergoing hallux and non-hallux primary procedures. Overall, increasing age remains the only independent predictor of iMAFS and OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.