Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156608›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Mask-R

Sara Moccia, Maria Chiara Fiorentino, Emanuele Frontoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara MocciaThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. sara.moccia@santannapisa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4494-8907
Maria Chiara FiorentinoDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Emanuele FrontoniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesFetal head-circumference (HC) measurement from ultrasound (US) images provides useful hints for assessing fetal growth. Such measurement is performed manually during the actual clinical practice, posing issues relevant to intra- and inter-clinician variability. This work presents a fully automatic, deep-learning-based approach to HC delineation, which we named Mask-R

methodsMask-R

resultsMask-R

conclusionsWith this work, we proposed an end-to-end model for HC distance-field regression. With our experimental results, we showed that Mask-R

Indexed as

HeadImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansUltrasonographyDeep learningDistance fieldsFetal UltrasoundHead-circumference delineation

Identifiers

PMID34156608
PMCPMC8580944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.