ArticleArchives of toxicology2021
The "EU chemicals strategy for sustainability" questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence?
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Regulation of chemicals demands assessment of risks rather than identification of hazards only.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- A Review of the Applications, Benefits, and Challenges of Generative AI for Sustainable Toxicology.Current research in toxicology · 2025Review
- The European regulatory system for plant protection products-cause of a "Silent Spring" or highly advanced and protective?Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2025Article
- Comparative case study on NAMs: towards enhancing specific target organ toxicity analysis.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
- New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!Environment international · 2023Review
- Review
- A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: an opportunity to develop new approaches for hazard and risk assessment.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- Reply to the opinion paper "The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: an opportunity to develop new approaches for hazard assessment" by Scholz et al.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- An approach for mixture testing and prioritization based on common kinetic groups.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: critical reflections on proposed regulatory changes for endocrine disruptors and mixture toxicity.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy.Archives of toxicology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.