ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2021
[Proximal avulsion of the rectus femoris muscle].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjuries of the thigh muscles are among the most frequent sports injuries. For example, in soccer they represent nearly 30% of all injuries. The rectus femoris muscle is particularly exposed to injury due to its anatomical features. While distal ruptures involve the quadriceps tendon and are among the more frequent injuries not only in sports, proximal ruptures represent a rarity. Because of the mostly indifferent clinical signs, the diagnosis is often delayed. In the literature various versions of classifications on the grading of muscle injuries have been described.
objectiveWith respect to the rectus femoris muscle, there is no classification system from which a treatment decision or an algorithm can be derived. The problem is not only the unclear classification of the injury but also the variability of treatment options resulting from this. MATERIAL AND
methodsA selective search of the literature was carried out to construct a review article.
resultsNo standardized follow-up treatment after surgical interventions or an established procedure for conservative treatment is currently available.
conclusionThe comparison of the individual studies is made difficult due to the low case numbers and nonuniform classification systems. A valid treatment algorithm can only be derived with difficulty based on the currently available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.