ArticleRadiology2021
Trends in Occupational Radiation Doses for U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing General Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures, 1980-2015.
Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph
Article in Radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of voxel size on hand dose calculations and dose-area histogram analysis for radiopharmaceutical operators.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Occupational radiation exposure and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of Canadian medical workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026Article
- 100 years of Personal Badge Radiation Doses in a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists: Expanded and Updated Reconstruction, 1916-2020.Radiation research · 2026Article
- Occupational exposure to ionising radiation and central nervous system tumour mortality: a pooled analysis of Korean, French and US medical radiation workers.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Sex-specific radiation-associated lung cancer mortality risks as impacted by smoking among US radiological technologists.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Potential biomarkers of chronic low-dose radiation exposure for nuclear medicine technologists.International journal of radiation biology · 2025Review
- A Historical Survey of Key Epidemiological Studies of Ionizing Radiation Exposure.Radiation research · 2024Review
- Occupational Radiation Dose Trends in U.S. Radiologic Technologists Assisting with Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures, 1980-2020.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2024Article
- Radiation-Related Thyroid Cancer.Endocrine reviews · 2024Review
- Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in medical staff: trends during the 2009-2019 period in a multicentric study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Impact of the Frequency and Type of Procedures Performed in Nuclear Medicine Units on the Expected Radiological Hazard.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Daphnée VilloingFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-1437-2211
David BorregoFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-9868-5113
Dale L PrestonFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-0641-2925
Bruce H AlexanderFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-9523-1914
André RoseFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).
Mark SalaskyFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).
Martha S LinetFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).
Choonsik LeeFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).
Cari M KitaharaFrom the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, MD 20850 (D.V., D.B., A.R., M.S.L., C.L., C.M.K.); Hirosoft International, Eureka, Calif (D.L.P.); Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (B.H.A.); Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo (B.H.A.); and Landauer, Glenwood, Ill (M.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-6416-4432
National Institutes of Health · USISCO International (United States) · USLandauer (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · US
Funding
Studies of Populations Exposed to Occupational Sources of RadiationZIACP010133 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KITAHARA, CARI · 2009 to 2025
$34.2MAbstract
Background Occupational doses to most medical radiation workers have declined substantially since the 1950s because of improvements in radiation protection practices. However, different patterns may have emerged for radiologic technologists working with nuclear medicine because of the higher per-procedure doses and increasing workloads. Purpose To summarize annual occupational doses during a 36-year period for a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists and to compare dose between general radiologic technologists and those specializing in nuclear medicine procedures. Materials and Methods Annual personal dose equivalents (referred to as
Indexed as
Allied Health PersonnelTechnology, RadiologicAdultDiagnostic ImagingHumansNuclear MedicineOccupational ExposureRadiation DosageRadiation ProtectionUnited States
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.