Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156160›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

ADME gene polymorphisms do not influence the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel: Results from a population pharmacokinetic study in Indian cancer patients.

Anand Patil, Bharati Shriyan, Parsshava Mehta, Mrudula Patil, Murari Gurjar, Manjunath Nookala, Vijay Patil, Amit Joshi, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabhash and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anand PatilDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Bharati ShriyanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Parsshava MehtaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Mrudula PatilDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Murari GurjarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Manjunath NookalaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Vijay PatilHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Amit JoshiHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Vanita NoronhaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8858-5004
Vikram GotaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6348-6667
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 82/14/2012/PHGEN(TF)/BMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacokinetics (PK) of docetaxel is characterized by high inter-individual variability (IIV). While covariate models that explain the PK variability of docetaxel exist, not much is known about the effects of genetic variations on docetaxel disposition.

methodsFifty patients with head and neck or prostate cancer were enrolled of whom two patients withdrew consent before the start of the study. Docetaxel was administered at either 50 or 75 mg/m

resultsDocetaxel PK was well characterized by a three-compartment model. Clearance (Cl) was found to be 18 L/h with an IIV of 45.3%. None of the genetic variants showed significant covariate effect on the Cl of docetaxel. Patients with abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were found to have 25% lower Cl as compared to patients with normal ALT values. However, the covariate effect could not be established in the final model possibly due to lack of adequate number of patients with abnormal ALT.

conclusionGenetic polymorphisms in the ADME gene do not explain the IIV in PK of docetaxel. However, patients with abnormal liver function might require dose reduction. CLINICAL

trial registrationNot applicable since participants in this study received treatment that was standard of care.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedPharmacogenomic VariantsProstatic NeoplasmsReference ValuesAlanine TransaminaseAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelADMEdocetaxelpharmacogeneticspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID34156160
PMCPMC8290241
OpenAlexW3176625057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.