ArticleESC heart failure2021
Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aortic valve stenosis serum IGFBP2 mediates female-specific Evogliptin resistance in valve myofibroblasts.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Proteomic machine-learning signatures associated with carotid plaque: A population-based hypothesis-generating study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interleukin-17, Interleukin-18, T Regulatory Cells, and T-Helper 17 (Th17) Cells Play a Role in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Sex differences in proteomics of cardiovascular disease -International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex-specific cardiovascular protein levels and their link with clinical outcome in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- A year in heart failure: updates of clinical and preclinical findings.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Sex-based differences in cardiovascular proteomic profiles and their associations with adverse outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure.Biology of sex differences · 2023Article
- Biomarker profiles in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: results from the DIAST-CHF study.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Recent Developments in Clinical Plasma Proteomics-Applied to Cardiovascular Research.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Identification of sex-specific biomarkers predicting new-onset heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHeart failure (HF) is common in both men and women, yet disease pathophysiology, presentation, and progression differ between sexes. Studies addressing whether biomarkers predict new onset HF sex-specifically are scarce. This study therefore aims to test the sex-specificity of 252 protein biomarkers for new-onset HF. METHODS AND
resultsA matched case-control design in patients selected from cohorts within the HOMAGE consortium was used. Cases (new-onset HF, n = 562) and controls (n = 780) were matched for cohort (PREDICTOR, HEALTH-ABC, & PROSPER), follow-up time (defined as time from entry to incident HF), and age. Incident HF was defined as first hospitalization for HF. Targeted plasma proteins (n = 252) were measured using Proximity Extension Assay technology from O-link. To look for sex differences for new onset HF, we adjusted for cohort, age, and baseline clinical parameters. At baseline, women had a biomarker profile reflecting activated metabolism and immune responses. However, none of the biomarkers had a significant interaction with sex in predicting new onset HF, but four biomarkers had a trend towards sex-specificity (P < 0.013). E-selectin and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist were more female-specific, whereas IL17A and CHIT1 tended to be male sex-specific for incident HF.
conclusionsThe majority of biomarkers associated with incident HF did not significantly differ between women and men, despite clear differences in biomarkers at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.